Malik v. State Petroleum Corp. et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 414 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBurnyeat, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterEQUITY,CONTRACTS,COMPANY LAW,PRACTICE
Date30 May 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Colter Developments Ltd. et al. v. Squamish JV Ltd. et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 415
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 17, 2015
    ...the piercing of the corporate veil. As Mr. Justice Burnyeat stated in Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 29: It is a well settled proposition of law that a company has a separate legal existence independent from that of its shareholders: Sal......
  • Porter v. Fleischer et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 389
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 30, 2011
    ...... See also: Galaxy Sports Inc. (Re) , 2005 BCSC 278 at para. 122; Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 30. [97] I return then to the question of the appropriate notice period. I am satisfied that in light of my conclusions regarding damages,......
  • Malik v. State Petroleum Corp. et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 425 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 4, 2007
    ...became a successor to any of the liabilities of State or Arakis. SHOULD AN ORDER BE MADE AGAINST TALISMAN? [14] In a separate decision, (2007 BCSC 739), the application of Talisman pursuant to Rule 18A of the Rules of Court was allowed and the action of the Plaintiff against Talisman was ......
3 cases
  • Colter Developments Ltd. et al. v. Squamish JV Ltd. et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 415
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 17, 2015
    ...the piercing of the corporate veil. As Mr. Justice Burnyeat stated in Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 29: It is a well settled proposition of law that a company has a separate legal existence independent from that of its shareholders: Sal......
  • Porter v. Fleischer et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 389
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 30, 2011
    ...... See also: Galaxy Sports Inc. (Re) , 2005 BCSC 278 at para. 122; Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 30. [97] I return then to the question of the appropriate notice period. I am satisfied that in light of my conclusions regarding damages,......
  • Malik v. State Petroleum Corp. et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 425 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 4, 2007
    ...became a successor to any of the liabilities of State or Arakis. SHOULD AN ORDER BE MADE AGAINST TALISMAN? [14] In a separate decision, (2007 BCSC 739), the application of Talisman pursuant to Rule 18A of the Rules of Court was allowed and the action of the Plaintiff against Talisman was ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT