Malik v. State Petroleum Corp. et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 414 (SC)
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Burnyeat, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Subject Matter | EQUITY,CONTRACTS,COMPANY LAW,PRACTICE |
Date | 30 May 2007 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Colter Developments Ltd. et al. v. Squamish JV Ltd. et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 415
...the piercing of the corporate veil. As Mr. Justice Burnyeat stated in Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 29: It is a well settled proposition of law that a company has a separate legal existence independent from that of its shareholders: Sal......
-
Porter v. Fleischer et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 389
...... See also: Galaxy Sports Inc. (Re) , 2005 BCSC 278 at para. 122; Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 30. [97] I return then to the question of the appropriate notice period. I am satisfied that in light of my conclusions regarding damages,......
-
Malik v. State Petroleum Corp. et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 425 (SC)
...became a successor to any of the liabilities of State or Arakis. SHOULD AN ORDER BE MADE AGAINST TALISMAN? [14] In a separate decision, (2007 BCSC 739), the application of Talisman pursuant to Rule 18A of the Rules of Court was allowed and the action of the Plaintiff against Talisman was ......
3 cases
-
Colter Developments Ltd. et al. v. Squamish JV Ltd. et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 415
...the piercing of the corporate veil. As Mr. Justice Burnyeat stated in Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 29: It is a well settled proposition of law that a company has a separate legal existence independent from that of its shareholders: Sal......
-
Porter v. Fleischer et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 389
...... See also: Galaxy Sports Inc. (Re) , 2005 BCSC 278 at para. 122; Malik (Representative ad litem of) v. State Petroleum Corp. , 2007 BCSC 739 at para. 30. [97] I return then to the question of the appropriate notice period. I am satisfied that in light of my conclusions regarding damages,......
-
Malik v. State Petroleum Corp. et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 425 (SC)
...became a successor to any of the liabilities of State or Arakis. SHOULD AN ORDER BE MADE AGAINST TALISMAN? [14] In a separate decision, (2007 BCSC 739), the application of Talisman pursuant to Rule 18A of the Rules of Court was allowed and the action of the Plaintiff against Talisman was ......