Mao v. Rao,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Crossin |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 2073 |
| Date | 22 October 2021 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | E57333 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2023 ABCJ 114,
...CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence presented, often relying on B......
-
Bato v Cano,
...CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence presented, often relying on B......
2 cases
-
2023 ABCJ 114,
...CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence presented, often relying on B......
-
Bato v Cano,
...CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence presented, often relying on B......