Mao v. Rao,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Crossin |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 2073 |
| Date | 22 October 2021 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | E57333 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
2025 BCSC 2091,
...s. 95(2)(f). This further supports an unequal division of the equity to give Ms. Zhang the benefit of the payments she made: Mao v. Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073 at paras. 212 Given the above, I am satisfied that equal division of family property would be substantially unfair to Ms. Zhang because Mr.......
-
Li v Zhang,
...s. 95(2)(f). This further supports an unequal division of the equity to give Ms. Zhang the benefit of the payments she made: Mao v. Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073 at paras. 212 Given the above, I am satisfied that equal division of family property would be substantially unfair to Ms. Zhang because Mr.......
-
2025 BCSC 975,
...of the Family Residence beyond market forces that weighs in favour of unequal division: Chandi at paras. 103–109, citing Mao v. Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073 at paras. 208–209, 139 Section 95(2)(i) of the FLA provides the Court may consider “any other factor” that may lead to significant unfairness, ......
-
B.F.W. v F.P.,
...of the Family Residence beyond market forces that weighs in favour of unequal division: Chandi at paras. 103–109, citing Mao v. Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073 at paras. 208–209, 139 Section 95(2)(i) of the FLA provides the Court may consider “any other factor” that may lead to significant unfairness, ......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
2024 BCSC 1159,
...contribution to a mortgage is a factor that may increase the value of the property to invoke that section. 152 In Mao v. Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the Court considered a spouse's claim for reapportionment of the equity in the family home to account for her sole post-separation contribution to th......
-
Popein v Popein,
...contribution to a mortgage is a factor that may increase the value of the property to invoke that section. 152 In Mao v. Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the Court considered a spouse's claim for reapportionment of the equity in the family home to account for her sole post-separation contribution to th......
-
2023 ABCJ 114,
...CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence presented, often relying on B......
-
Bato v Cano,
...CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence presented, often relying on B......
Get Started for Free