Marcovitch v. Kertes et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1496
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Stinson, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS |
| Citation | [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1496,2012 ONSC 1496,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 1496 (SC) |
| Date | 21 June 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Thompson v. Mungham et al., 2013 ONSC 4994
...of the Act or the law of discoverability. [18] KOB contends that the law is well settled: as stated in the case of Marcovitch v. Kurtes, 2012 ONSC 1496, [2012] O.J. No. 1024, at para. 45, a Defendant cannot be added to an action following the two year limitation period unless the Plaintiff ......
1 cases
-
Thompson v. Mungham et al., 2013 ONSC 4994
...of the Act or the law of discoverability. [18] KOB contends that the law is well settled: as stated in the case of Marcovitch v. Kurtes, 2012 ONSC 1496, [2012] O.J. No. 1024, at para. 45, a Defendant cannot be added to an action following the two year limitation period unless the Plaintiff ......