Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE,EVIDENCE,STATUTES,COURTS |
| Citation | 2017 FC 806 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 08 September 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Seara Alimentos Ltda. v. Amira Enterprises Inc., 2019 FCA 63
...(1986), 10 C.P.R. (3d) 486 at p. 492 (F.C.T.D.) [Coronet], as cited in Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806. Coronet has been invoked on many occasions by the TMOB in the past: see e.g. Protech Chemicals Ltd./Protech Chimie Ltée. c. PROTECH S.A.M., ......
-
Canadian Trade-Marks: Year In Review 2017
...to strike the ENLIGHTEN trade-mark from the register was set aside. Split Decisions In Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806, the Federal Court clarified whether the Registrar of Trade-marks has the jurisdiction to issue a "split" decision pursuant to the s. 38(8) of th......
-
No Cookies For You! Federal Court Confirms Jurisdiction To Issue Split Decisions In Trade-Mark Oppositions
...Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806, Metro appealed a Trade-marks Opposition Board decision which allowed S&M Enterprises' registration of a mark in the word "IRRESISTABLES" in association candy and snacks, namely candy bars, chocolate bars, al......
-
Use In Canada, Get It Before It's Gone The Federal Court Of Canada Provides Some Clarity Regarding Claiming Use In Canada
...(3) use and registration abroad; and (4) making known in Canada. In Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., (2017 FC 806. per Annis J.), the Federal Court has clarified that in order to base an application on use in Canada, pursuant to Section 30(b) of the Trade-m......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 cases
-
Seara Alimentos Ltda. v. Amira Enterprises Inc., 2019 FCA 63
...(1986), 10 C.P.R. (3d) 486 at p. 492 (F.C.T.D.) [Coronet], as cited in Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806. Coronet has been invoked on many occasions by the TMOB in the past: see e.g. Protech Chemicals Ltd./Protech Chimie Ltée. c. PROTECH S.A.M., ......
5 firm's commentaries
-
Canadian Trade-Marks: Year In Review 2017
...to strike the ENLIGHTEN trade-mark from the register was set aside. Split Decisions In Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806, the Federal Court clarified whether the Registrar of Trade-marks has the jurisdiction to issue a "split" decision pursuant to the s. 38(8) of th......
-
No Cookies For You! Federal Court Confirms Jurisdiction To Issue Split Decisions In Trade-Mark Oppositions
...Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806, Metro appealed a Trade-marks Opposition Board decision which allowed S&M Enterprises' registration of a mark in the word "IRRESISTABLES" in association candy and snacks, namely candy bars, chocolate bars, al......
-
Use In Canada, Get It Before It's Gone The Federal Court Of Canada Provides Some Clarity Regarding Claiming Use In Canada
...(3) use and registration abroad; and (4) making known in Canada. In Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., (2017 FC 806. per Annis J.), the Federal Court has clarified that in order to base an application on use in Canada, pursuant to Section 30(b) of the Trade-m......
-
Trademarks Decision: In Context Of Opposition, Registrar Has Jurisdiction To Issue A 'Split' Decision For Accepted Goods And/Or Services Under Subsection 38(8) (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts - Week of September 18, 2017)
...decision for accepted goods and/or services under subsection 38(8) Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806 This was an appeal pursuant to section 56 of the Trademarks Act from the Opposition Board's decision allowing the registration of the Respondent'......
Request a trial to view additional results