Marton v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles (B.C.) et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 422

JudgeKent, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateMarch 19, 2015
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 422;[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 422 (SC);2015 BCSC 422
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Mackenzie v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 2392
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 27, 2017
    ...and requires the driver to essentially refute statements in that report": Marton v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 422 at para. 8.[45] Based on this general framework numerous decisions of this Court have addressed the question of whether a delegate of the Su......
  • Osterreicher v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 8, 2021
    ...on Mr. Osterreicher’s breath was said by counsel, adopting language from Marton v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 422 at para. 8, to be “at best mistaken and at worst something far more [8] The adjudicator began her analysis on the lawfulness of the demand by......
2 cases
  • Mackenzie v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 2392
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 27, 2017
    ...and requires the driver to essentially refute statements in that report": Marton v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 422 at para. 8.[45] Based on this general framework numerous decisions of this Court have addressed the question of whether a delegate of the Su......
  • Osterreicher v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 8, 2021
    ...on Mr. Osterreicher’s breath was said by counsel, adopting language from Marton v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 422 at para. 8, to be “at best mistaken and at worst something far more [8] The adjudicator began her analysis on the lawfulness of the demand by......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT