Mayer v. Mayer

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Grauer
Citation2018 BCSC 8
Date04 January 2018
Docket NumberS073324

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Vidcom Communications Ltd. v. Rattan
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 6, 2022
    ...absent pecuniary loss, they are not rare. [Emphasis in Soulos omitted.] [25] More recently, Grauer J. (as he then was) in Mayer v. Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8, summarised the current state of the law in light BNSF as [134] With respect to knowing receipt, Mhinder relies on that subset involving stra......
  • Sharma v. Lifetec Construction Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 6, 2022
    ...since few choose to litigate absent pecuniary loss, they are not rare. [25] More recently, Grauer J. (as he then was) in Mayer v. Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8, summarised the current state of the law in light BNSF as [134] With respect to knowing receipt, Mhinder relies on that subset involving stran......
  • Boston Development Corporation v Takhar
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 14, 2026
    ...current state of the law in respect of substantive constructive trust as articulated by Justice Grauer (as he then was) in Mayer v. Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8, in which he explained: [135] A remedial constructive trust, as discussed above, is a judicial remedy constructed by the court and imposed t......
  • Rab v. Prescott
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 24, 2021
    ...finding that the respondent’s evidence, both expert and personal, was generally unreliable. To paraphrase what I said in Mayer v Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8 at para 116, it does not necessarily follow that because the respondent’s evidence is unreliable, her position is untenable. This is particular......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Vidcom Communications Ltd. v. Rattan
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 6, 2022
    ...absent pecuniary loss, they are not rare. [Emphasis in Soulos omitted.] [25] More recently, Grauer J. (as he then was) in Mayer v. Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8, summarised the current state of the law in light BNSF as [134] With respect to knowing receipt, Mhinder relies on that subset involving stra......
  • Sharma v. Lifetec Construction Group Inc.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 6, 2022
    ...since few choose to litigate absent pecuniary loss, they are not rare. [25] More recently, Grauer J. (as he then was) in Mayer v. Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8, summarised the current state of the law in light BNSF as [134] With respect to knowing receipt, Mhinder relies on that subset involving stran......
  • Boston Development Corporation v Takhar
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 14, 2026
    ...current state of the law in respect of substantive constructive trust as articulated by Justice Grauer (as he then was) in Mayer v. Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8, in which he explained: [135] A remedial constructive trust, as discussed above, is a judicial remedy constructed by the court and imposed t......
  • Rab v. Prescott
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 24, 2021
    ...finding that the respondent’s evidence, both expert and personal, was generally unreliable. To paraphrase what I said in Mayer v Mayer, 2018 BCSC 8 at para 116, it does not necessarily follow that because the respondent’s evidence is unreliable, her position is untenable. This is particular......
  • Get Started for Free