Mayhew v. Jibb et al., [2002] O.T.C. 342 (SupCt)
Judge | MacDougall, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Case Date | January 18, 2002 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | [2002] O.T.C. 342 (SupCt) |
Mayhew v. Jibb, [2002] O.T.C. 342 (SupCt)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2002] O.T.C. TBEd. MY.053
Shelly Jane Mayhew (appellant) v. Scott Jibb, Chief Building Official for the Corporation of the Township of Hamilton, and the Corporation of The Township of Hamilton (respondents)
(Cobourg Court File No. 004918)
Indexed As: Mayhew v. Jibb et al.
Court of Ontario
Superior Court of Justice
Cobourg
MacDougall, J.
April 17, 2002.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Land Regulation - Topic 3215
Land use control - Building or development permits - Grounds for refusal - Proposed construction not in compliance with applicable law - See paragraphs 1 to 48.
Cases Noticed:
Woodglen & Co. v. North York and Building Inspector for North York (Uzumeri) (1984), 5 O.A.C. 313; 47 O.R.(2d) 614; 12 D.L.R.(4th) 146 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22].
Summit Glenn Development Corp. v. Toronto (City) (1989), 44 M.P.L.R. 50 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 24].
H & D International Group v. Toronto (City) (1988), 44 M.P.L.R. 187 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 25].
Frontenac-Lennox & Addington (County) Roman Catholic Separate School Board v. Kingston (City) (1994), 25 M.P.L.R.(2d) 102 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 25].
Alaimo v. North York (City) Chief Building Official (1995), 26 M.P.L.R.(2d) 69 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 27].
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Ltd. v. Humm et al. (1983), 24 M.P.L.R. 103 (Ont. Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 29].
Upper Thames River Conservation Authority v. London (City) (1989), 67 O.R.(2d) 748; 42 M.P.L.R. 241 (Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 30].
Stacey v. Oxford-On-Rideau (1989), 46 M.P.L.R. 15 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 30].
Woodglen & Co. v. North York (City) (1994), 23 M.P.L.R.(2d) 219 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 31].
Rotstein v. North York (City) Chief Building Official (1995), 29 M.P.L.R.(2d) 305 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 33].
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corp. for the Diocese of Peterborough, Ontario v. Cobourg (Town) et al. (1998), 62 O.T.C. 338; 46 M.P.L.R.(2d) 195 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 36].
723 Rymal Inc. v. Lampman, [2001] O.T.C. 138; 17 M.P.L.R.(3d) 230 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 43].
Statutes Noticed:
Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, sect. 8(2)(a) [para. 16]; sect. 25(4) [para. 21].
Counsel:
D. Wayne Fairbrother, for the appellant;
C. Gregory Kay, for the respondents.
This appeal was heard on January 18, 2002, before MacDougall, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following judgment on April 17, 2002.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial