Mayhew v. Jibb et al., [2002] O.T.C. 342 (SupCt)

JudgeMacDougall, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 18, 2002
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2002] O.T.C. 342 (SupCt)

Mayhew v. Jibb, [2002] O.T.C. 342 (SupCt)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2002] O.T.C. TBEd. MY.053

Shelly Jane Mayhew (appellant) v. Scott Jibb, Chief Building Official for the Corporation of the Township of Hamilton, and the Corporation of The Township of Hamilton (respondents)

(Cobourg Court File No. 004918)

Indexed As: Mayhew v. Jibb et al.

Court of Ontario

Superior Court of Justice

Cobourg

MacDougall, J.

April 17, 2002.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Land Regulation - Topic 3215

Land use control - Building or development permits - Grounds for refusal - Proposed construction not in compliance with applicable law - See paragraphs 1 to 48.

Cases Noticed:

Woodglen & Co. v. North York and Building Inspector for North York (Uzumeri) (1984), 5 O.A.C. 313; 47 O.R.(2d) 614; 12 D.L.R.(4th) 146 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22].

Summit Glenn Development Corp. v. Toronto (City) (1989), 44 M.P.L.R. 50 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 24].

H & D International Group v. Toronto (City) (1988), 44 M.P.L.R. 187 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 25].

Frontenac-Lennox & Addington (County) Roman Catholic Separate School Board v. Kingston (City) (1994), 25 M.P.L.R.(2d) 102 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 25].

Alaimo v. North York (City) Chief Building Official (1995), 26 M.P.L.R.(2d) 69 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 27].

McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Ltd. v. Humm et al. (1983), 24 M.P.L.R. 103 (Ont. Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 29].

Upper Thames River Conservation Authority v. London (City) (1989), 67 O.R.(2d) 748; 42 M.P.L.R. 241 (Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 30].

Stacey v. Oxford-On-Rideau (1989), 46 M.P.L.R. 15 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 30].

Woodglen & Co. v. North York (City) (1994), 23 M.P.L.R.(2d) 219 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 31].

Rotstein v. North York (City) Chief Building Official (1995), 29 M.P.L.R.(2d) 305 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 33].

Roman Catholic Episcopal Corp. for the Diocese of Peterborough, Ontario v. Cobourg (Town) et al. (1998), 62 O.T.C. 338; 46 M.P.L.R.(2d) 195 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 36].

723 Rymal Inc. v. Lampman, [2001] O.T.C. 138; 17 M.P.L.R.(3d) 230 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 43].

Statutes Noticed:

Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, sect. 8(2)(a) [para. 16]; sect. 25(4) [para. 21].

Counsel:

D. Wayne Fairbrother, for the appellant;

C. Gregory Kay, for the respondents.

This appeal was heard on January 18, 2002, before MacDougall, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following judgment on April 17, 2002.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT