Mazur v. Lucas et al., 2011 BCSC 1685
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Humphries, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Citation | 2011 BCSC 1685,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1685,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1685 (SC) |
| Date | 09 December 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 practice notes
-
C.P. v. RBC Life Insurance Co., (2015) 366 B.C.A.C. 207 (CA)
...227; 488 W.A.C. 227; 7 B.C.L.R.(5th) 246; 2010 BCCA 302, refd to. [para. 100]. Mazur v. Lucas et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1685; 2011 BCSC 1685, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Rules of Court (B.C.) - see Supreme Court Civil Rules (B.C.). Supreme Court Civil Rules, rule 37B(5) [para. 85]......
-
Sauer v. Scales, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1883 (SC)
...law as set out in Smith have held that legal representation by an insurer will not count against a party in every case: Mazur v. Lucas , 2011 BCSC 1685 ( Mazur ) at para. 53; Ward v. Klaus , 2012 BCSC 99 at para. 43. In the words of Humphries J. in Mazur , at para. 53, "[w]hile insurance co......
-
Noori v. Hughes, 2019 BCSC 139
...the trial court as to how this factor should be applied. In that regard, I follow the course charted by Humphries J. in Mazur v. Lucas, 2011 BCSC 1685 in which she held that “while insurance coverage is not automatically a factor to be considered against the insured party, the facts of the ......
-
Desharnais v. Parkhurst et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 758
...jury ultimately does: Lumanlan v. Sadler , 2009 BCSC 142 at para. 35; Smagh v. Bumbrah , 2009 BCSC 623 at paras. 12-14; Mazur v. Lucas , 2011 BCSC 1685 at para. 60; Wafler v. Trinh , 2012 BCSC 1708, at paras. 33-34 (aff'd, 2014 BCCA 95). [39] There is some merit to the Applicants' submissio......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
C.P. v. RBC Life Insurance Co., (2015) 366 B.C.A.C. 207 (CA)
...227; 488 W.A.C. 227; 7 B.C.L.R.(5th) 246; 2010 BCCA 302, refd to. [para. 100]. Mazur v. Lucas et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1685; 2011 BCSC 1685, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Rules of Court (B.C.) - see Supreme Court Civil Rules (B.C.). Supreme Court Civil Rules, rule 37B(5) [para. 85]......
-
Sauer v. Scales, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1883 (SC)
...law as set out in Smith have held that legal representation by an insurer will not count against a party in every case: Mazur v. Lucas , 2011 BCSC 1685 ( Mazur ) at para. 53; Ward v. Klaus , 2012 BCSC 99 at para. 43. In the words of Humphries J. in Mazur , at para. 53, "[w]hile insurance co......
-
Desharnais v. Parkhurst et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 758
...jury ultimately does: Lumanlan v. Sadler , 2009 BCSC 142 at para. 35; Smagh v. Bumbrah , 2009 BCSC 623 at paras. 12-14; Mazur v. Lucas , 2011 BCSC 1685 at para. 60; Wafler v. Trinh , 2012 BCSC 1708, at paras. 33-34 (aff'd, 2014 BCCA 95). [39] There is some merit to the Applicants' submissio......
-
Noori v. Hughes, 2019 BCSC 139
...the trial court as to how this factor should be applied. In that regard, I follow the course charted by Humphries J. in Mazur v. Lucas, 2011 BCSC 1685 in which she held that “while insurance coverage is not automatically a factor to be considered against the insured party, the facts of the ......
Request a trial to view additional results