McAllister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999

JudgeJ.C. Kubik
Citation2018 ABQB 999
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number0701 07017
Date10 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 513
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 24, 2020
    ...Weatherford Canada Partnership v Addie, 2018 ABQB 571 at paras 54-57, aff’d 2019 ABCA 92 [Weatherford]; and McAllister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999. This Court confirmed that the obligation to compensate the wrongfully accused party in costs may stem from the reputational and personal im......
  • GO Community Centre v Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2020 ABQB 203
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 25, 2020
    ...Geophysical Service Incorporated v Falkland Oil and Gas Ltd, 2019 ABQB 314, Woolley J at paras 16 and 28 and McAllister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999, Kubik J at para [14] Schedule C costs serve many useful purposes in litigation. First, they reward a successful party by compensating them......
  • McAllister v Calgary (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 27, 2021
    ...from the Judgment by The Honourable Madam Justice J.C. Kubik Dated the 10th day of December, 2018 Filed on the 23rd day of January, 2019 (2018 ABQB 999, Docket: _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment ___________________________________________________......
  • Estate of Montgomery, 2019 ABQB 833
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 5, 2019
    ...been updated in over twenty years and due to inflation, it has been described as “grossly out of date”: see McAllister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999; and Appleby v Smallwood, 2019 ABQB [78] I agree that “when the Court is obliged to make numerous and substantial adjustments to the Schedul......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc, 2020 ABQB 513
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 24, 2020
    ...Weatherford Canada Partnership v Addie, 2018 ABQB 571 at paras 54-57, aff’d 2019 ABCA 92 [Weatherford]; and McAllister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999. This Court confirmed that the obligation to compensate the wrongfully accused party in costs may stem from the reputational and personal im......
  • GO Community Centre v Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd, 2020 ABQB 203
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 25, 2020
    ...Geophysical Service Incorporated v Falkland Oil and Gas Ltd, 2019 ABQB 314, Woolley J at paras 16 and 28 and McAllister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999, Kubik J at para [14] Schedule C costs serve many useful purposes in litigation. First, they reward a successful party by compensating them......
  • Estate of Montgomery, 2019 ABQB 833
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 5, 2019
    ...been updated in over twenty years and due to inflation, it has been described as “grossly out of date”: see McAllister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999; and Appleby v Smallwood, 2019 ABQB [78] I agree that “when the Court is obliged to make numerous and substantial adjustments to the Schedul......
  • McAllister v Calgary (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 27, 2021
    ...from the Judgment by The Honourable Madam Justice J.C. Kubik Dated the 10th day of December, 2018 Filed on the 23rd day of January, 2019 (2018 ABQB 999, Docket: _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment ___________________________________________________......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Costs Part 2: Amendments To Schedule C To The Alberta Rules Of Court
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 4, 2020
    ...were last amended in 1998. In recent cases, this concern led to the application of an inflation factor: McCallister v Calgary (City), 2018 ABQB 999, at para 20 (costs grossed up by 46.60%); R & R Consilium Inc v Talbot, 2019 ABQB 275, at para 70 (enhanced costs further increased by 40% as a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT