McCallum v. Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2022 FC 969
Date29 June 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Pittman v. Ashcroft First Nation, 2022 FC 1380
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...application, the Court decides the validity of the election without showing deference to anyone: McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 at paragraph 68 [McCallum]. The Band list application seeks several declarations, that is, statements of the legal situation of the parties. ......
  • Collins v. Saddle Lake Cree Nation #462,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 24, 2023
    ...question, but solicitor-client costs or even elevated costs are not automatic (Whalen; McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 at para [19] SLCN submits that in many other First Nation decisions involving elections, lump sums in costs were awarded closer to Tariff B calculation......
  • Acoose v. Zagimē Anishinabēk, 2024 FC 741
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 22, 2024
    ...for non-discretionary admission. [31] This Court had to deal with a similar situation in McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 [McCallum]. That First Nation had a membership code that mirrored the provisions of the Indian Act as they existed in 1987. It wished to amend its co......
  • Shanks v. Salt River First Nation #195,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 7, 2023
    ...raises issues that are important to a community does not, itself, warrant solicitor-client costs (McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 at para 128 [Canoe Lake]). [10] Further, SRFN argues the Application did not raise broad issues of public interest, as the Judgment was only......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Pittman v. Ashcroft First Nation, 2022 FC 1380
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...application, the Court decides the validity of the election without showing deference to anyone: McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 at paragraph 68 [McCallum]. The Band list application seeks several declarations, that is, statements of the legal situation of the parties. ......
  • Collins v. Saddle Lake Cree Nation #462,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 24, 2023
    ...question, but solicitor-client costs or even elevated costs are not automatic (Whalen; McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 at para [19] SLCN submits that in many other First Nation decisions involving elections, lump sums in costs were awarded closer to Tariff B calculation......
  • Acoose v. Zagimē Anishinabēk, 2024 FC 741
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 22, 2024
    ...for non-discretionary admission. [31] This Court had to deal with a similar situation in McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 [McCallum]. That First Nation had a membership code that mirrored the provisions of the Indian Act as they existed in 1987. It wished to amend its co......
  • Shanks v. Salt River First Nation #195,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 7, 2023
    ...raises issues that are important to a community does not, itself, warrant solicitor-client costs (McCallum v Canoe Lake Cree First Nation, 2022 FC 969 at para 128 [Canoe Lake]). [10] Further, SRFN argues the Application did not raise broad issues of public interest, as the Judgment was only......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT