McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Juriansz,Lauwers,Hourigan |
| Citation | 2017 ONCA 277 |
| Docket Number | C63041 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 03 April 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 13 ' 17, 2022)
...Insulation Local 675 Pension Fund v. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., 2020 ONCA 375, Johnson v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 650, McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277, Ontario v. Nanji, 2020 ONCA 591, Aecon Buildings v. Brampton (City), 2010 ONCA 773, Ontario v. Lipsitz, 2011 ONCA 466, Housen v. Nikolaisen, 200......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 3 7, 2017)
...record before him, to make the order that the appellants bring no further motions without leave. Civil Endorsements: McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277 [Juriansz, Lauwers and Hourigan JJ.A] Counsel: B. D. Siegel, for the appellants M. J. Stangarone and S. Timerman, for the respondent Keywor......
-
CHU de Québec-Université Laval v. Tree of Knowledge International Corp.,
...a decision granting a stay or dismissal is final, but a decision denying such relief is interlocutory, relying on McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277, at para. 1; Ontario v. Nanji, 2020 ONCA 591, at para. 8. Typically, in cases where a motion for a stay or dismissal is denied, the real matte......
-
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Nanji, 2020 ONCA 591
...[8] The general principle is that “an order granting a stay is final, but an order refusing one is interlocutory”: McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277. [9] An order is interlocutory if the merits of the case remain to be determined: Hendrickson v. Kallio, [1932] O.R. 675 (C.A.). The motion j......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
CHU de Québec-Université Laval v. Tree of Knowledge International Corp.,
...a decision granting a stay or dismissal is final, but a decision denying such relief is interlocutory, relying on McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277, at para. 1; Ontario v. Nanji, 2020 ONCA 591, at para. 8. Typically, in cases where a motion for a stay or dismissal is denied, the real matte......
-
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Nanji, 2020 ONCA 591
...[8] The general principle is that “an order granting a stay is final, but an order refusing one is interlocutory”: McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277. [9] An order is interlocutory if the merits of the case remain to be determined: Hendrickson v. Kallio, [1932] O.R. 675 (C.A.). The motion j......
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 13 ' 17, 2022)
...Insulation Local 675 Pension Fund v. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., 2020 ONCA 375, Johnson v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 650, McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277, Ontario v. Nanji, 2020 ONCA 591, Aecon Buildings v. Brampton (City), 2010 ONCA 773, Ontario v. Lipsitz, 2011 ONCA 466, Housen v. Nikolaisen, 200......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 3 7, 2017)
...record before him, to make the order that the appellants bring no further motions without leave. Civil Endorsements: McClintock v. Karam, 2017 ONCA 277 [Juriansz, Lauwers and Hourigan JJ.A] Counsel: B. D. Siegel, for the appellants M. J. Stangarone and S. Timerman, for the respondent Keywor......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 7 ' September 18, 2020)
...Appeals, Jurisdiction, Final or Interlocutory, Courts of Justice Act, RSO 1990, c C.43, ss. 6(1)(b), 19(1)(b), McClintock v Karam, 2017 ONCA 277, Hendrickson v Kallio, [1932] OR 675 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, eviction orders were suspended. The appellants sought to be recognized as class......