McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeWalker, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,PRACTICE
Citation2013 BCSC 534,[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 534,[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 534 (SC)
Date21 March 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 practice notes
  • Huang v. Silvercorp Metals Inc., 2017 BCSC 795
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 15, 2017
    ...wrongful acts that are not necessarily criminal in nature, including tortious conduct: Goldman, Sachs & Co.; McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534. Silvercorp submits that these cases are wrongly decided and emphasizes commentary warning against expanding the exception to communications......
  • Graham v. Canada (Minister of Justice),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 24, 2021
    ...so to ensure that the partial disclosure does not give an unfair advantage or create a misleading picture: McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534 at paras. 113‑117; Huang at para. [39] Waiver will cause loss of privilege only in relation to the particular subject matter over which privilege ......
  • McDermott v. McDermott, 2014 BCSC 1238
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 26, 2014
    ...of the Court such that the future crimes exception to solicitor-client privilege was engaged. [10] In my reasons for judgment, indexed at 2013 BCSC 534, I set out my findings concerning that plan. At para. 79, I said: I have determined that Mr. McDermott has established, through clear and c......
  • DeGiorgio v. DeGiorgio, 2020 ONSC 1674
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 18, 2020
    ...[2013] OJ No. 3153 (QL) (SC), 2013 ONSC 4272; Children’s Aid Society of London v. CDB and LDB, 2013 ONSC 5556; McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534; Scarlett v. Farrell, 2014 ONCJ [2] “Are there Any Rules of Evidence in Family Law” (2003) 21 CFLQ 245 ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
  • Huang v. Silvercorp Metals Inc., 2017 BCSC 795
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 15, 2017
    ...wrongful acts that are not necessarily criminal in nature, including tortious conduct: Goldman, Sachs & Co.; McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534. Silvercorp submits that these cases are wrongly decided and emphasizes commentary warning against expanding the exception to communications......
  • Graham v. Canada (Minister of Justice),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 24, 2021
    ...so to ensure that the partial disclosure does not give an unfair advantage or create a misleading picture: McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534 at paras. 113‑117; Huang at para. [39] Waiver will cause loss of privilege only in relation to the particular subject matter over which privilege ......
  • McDermott v. McDermott, 2014 BCSC 1238
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 26, 2014
    ...of the Court such that the future crimes exception to solicitor-client privilege was engaged. [10] In my reasons for judgment, indexed at 2013 BCSC 534, I set out my findings concerning that plan. At para. 79, I said: I have determined that Mr. McDermott has established, through clear and c......
  • DeGiorgio v. DeGiorgio, 2020 ONSC 1674
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 18, 2020
    ...[2013] OJ No. 3153 (QL) (SC), 2013 ONSC 4272; Children’s Aid Society of London v. CDB and LDB, 2013 ONSC 5556; McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534; Scarlett v. Farrell, 2014 ONCJ [2] “Are there Any Rules of Evidence in Family Law” (2003) 21 CFLQ 245 ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Estate Litigation Noteworthy Case Law 2022
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 20, 2023
    ...raising in a pleading or proceeding the legal advice that they received, thereby putting that advice in issue (McDermott v. McDermott, 2013 BCSC 534 at para. A party may waive the privilege by denying that they gave certain instructions to their lawyer: (York v. Gilligan (1996), 19 B.C.L.R.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT