Mcdowell v. Laverana GmbH & Co. KG, 2016 FC 1276

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateNovember 18, 2016
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2016 FC 1276
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Sherzady v. Norton Rose Fullbright Canada LLP/s.e.n.c.r.l., s.r.l., 2022 FC 1712
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 12, 2022
    ...2, 11, 12, The Black and Decker Corporation v Method Law, 2016 FC 1109 at paragraph 15, and McDowell v Laverana GmbH & Co KG, 2016 FC 1276 at paragraph 23 [McDowell]. [21] In my view, the references to “prima facie evidence” or “a prima facie case” in some of......
  • Is Use Of A Mark For Services Also Use On Goods Sold?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 2, 2016
    ...predictable. That point is brought home clearly by a recent decision of the Federal Court in Heather Ruth McDowell v Laverana GmbH KG (2016 FC 1276, per Fothergill J.) involving an uncontested appeal of a decision of the Registrar of Trade-marks in a non-use cancellation proceeding pursuant......
  • American Express Marketing & Development Corp. v. Black Card LLC, 2018 FC 362
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 5, 2018
    ...2008 FCA 279 at para 22). The deference owed to the TMOB’s expertise is reduced, but not eliminated (Mcdowell v Laverana GmbH & Co KG, 2016 FC 1276 at para 12, citing Mattel, Inc v 3894207 Canada Inc, 2006 SCC 22 at para 37). C. Are the disputed trademarks confusing with Amex’s unregist......
  • GNR Travel Centre Ltd. v. CWI, Inc., 2023 FC 2
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...in association with goods pursuant to section 4(1).” In so finding, the Board references Mcdowell v Laverana GmbH & Co KG, 2016 FC 1276 [Mcdowell] at paras 18 and 19; Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP v Park Pontiac Buick GMC Ltd (2005), 50 CPR (4th) 391 (TMOB) [Park Pontiac Bui......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Sherzady v. Norton Rose Fullbright Canada LLP/s.e.n.c.r.l., s.r.l., 2022 FC 1712
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 12, 2022
    ...2, 11, 12, The Black and Decker Corporation v Method Law, 2016 FC 1109 at paragraph 15, and McDowell v Laverana GmbH & Co KG, 2016 FC 1276 at paragraph 23 [McDowell]. [21] In my view, the references to “prima facie evidence” or “a prima facie case” in some of......
  • American Express Marketing & Development Corp. v. Black Card LLC, 2018 FC 362
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 5, 2018
    ...2008 FCA 279 at para 22). The deference owed to the TMOB’s expertise is reduced, but not eliminated (Mcdowell v Laverana GmbH & Co KG, 2016 FC 1276 at para 12, citing Mattel, Inc v 3894207 Canada Inc, 2006 SCC 22 at para 37). C. Are the disputed trademarks confusing with Amex’s unregist......
  • GNR Travel Centre Ltd. v. CWI, Inc., 2023 FC 2
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...in association with goods pursuant to section 4(1).” In so finding, the Board references Mcdowell v Laverana GmbH & Co KG, 2016 FC 1276 [Mcdowell] at paras 18 and 19; Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP v Park Pontiac Buick GMC Ltd (2005), 50 CPR (4th) 391 (TMOB) [Park Pontiac Bui......
  • International Name Plate Supplies Limited v. Marks & Clerk Canada,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 17, 2021
    ...that the Arts Affidavit had evidence to satisfy the section 4(3) requirements. [46] INPS relies upon McDowell v Laverana GmbH & Co KG, 2016 FC 1276, para 23 where the Court states that any ambiguity in the evidence should be resolved in favour of the registered owner. However, in my vie......
4 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT