McKay v. Labelle, 2019 ONCJ 155

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeSullivan
Citation2019 ONCJ 155
CourtOntario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
Date07 March 2019
Docket NumberBrampton 1263/18
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • M.L. v. G.M.D., 2020 NLSC 21
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • 6 Febrero 2020
    ...Children’s Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16; Moussa v. Sundhu, 2018 ONCJ 284; Maldonado v. Feliciano, 2018 ONCJ 652; McKay v. Labelle, 2019 ONCJ 155; Z.A. v. A.A., 2019 ONSC 5601; Bolla v. Swart, 2017 ONSC 1488; Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 STATUTES CONSIDERED: Children’s Law......
  • Johansson v. Janssen,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 Noviembre 2020
    ...she attempts to minimize that time as merely “vacation”. [26] It is possible for a child to have two habitual residences: A.M. v. D.L., 2019 ONCJ 155; M.M. v. S.T., 2014 ABCA 120 at para. 16. I find that is the case here. The factors relevant to determination of habitual residence as betwee......
  • Smith v Smith, 2019 SKQB 280
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 24 Octubre 2019
    ...legislation. A similar conclusion was reached in Maldonado v Feliciano, 2018 ONCJ 652 at para 37, 15 RFL (8th) 430, and McKay v Labelle, 2019 ONCJ 155 at para [44] However, the opposite conclusion was reached by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Kong v Song, 2019 BCCA 84, 21 BCLR (6th......
3 cases
  • M.L. v. G.M.D., 2020 NLSC 21
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • 6 Febrero 2020
    ...Children’s Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16; Moussa v. Sundhu, 2018 ONCJ 284; Maldonado v. Feliciano, 2018 ONCJ 652; McKay v. Labelle, 2019 ONCJ 155; Z.A. v. A.A., 2019 ONSC 5601; Bolla v. Swart, 2017 ONSC 1488; Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 STATUTES CONSIDERED: Children’s Law......
  • Johansson v. Janssen,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 Noviembre 2020
    ...she attempts to minimize that time as merely “vacation”. [26] It is possible for a child to have two habitual residences: A.M. v. D.L., 2019 ONCJ 155; M.M. v. S.T., 2014 ABCA 120 at para. 16. I find that is the case here. The factors relevant to determination of habitual residence as betwee......
  • Smith v Smith, 2019 SKQB 280
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 24 Octubre 2019
    ...legislation. A similar conclusion was reached in Maldonado v Feliciano, 2018 ONCJ 652 at para 37, 15 RFL (8th) 430, and McKay v Labelle, 2019 ONCJ 155 at para [44] However, the opposite conclusion was reached by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Kong v Song, 2019 BCCA 84, 21 BCLR (6th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT