McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Gray
Citation2017 BCSC 2328
Docket NumberM150213
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date15 December 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • THE TROUBLE WITH WIGMORE: A NEW APPROACH TO IMPLIED WAIVER OF SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 52 No. 1, January 2019
    • 1 Enero 2019
    ...at para 33). (83) See Procon Mining & Tunnelling Ltd v McNeil, 2009 BCCA 281 at para 18 [Procon]. (84) See McMahon v Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 at para 166; R v Bruce Power Inc, 2005 CarswellOnt 12052 (CJ) at para 40; R v Husky Oil Inc, 2017 SKQB 383 at para 40. The opposing party should no......
  • 2023 BCSC 1176,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...party from testing the justification or explanation: Brown v. Clark Wilson LLP, 2014 BCCA 185 at paras. 26, 30, 37; McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 at paras. 165–168. Our Court of Appeal recently summarized the applicable test as follows: [23] The foregoing passages are settled law......
  • 2023 BCSC 296,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...Psyllakis/Ellis Affidavits? 56 The court may strike all, or parts of, an affidavit containing inadmissible material: McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 at para. 108 citing Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, [1998] B.C.J. No. 2923 (BCSC) [In Chambers] at para. 57 Rule 22-2 provides......
  • Tasci (Re), 2020 BCSC 1438
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2020
    ...usually addressed by the practicalities and exigencies of decision making by giving offending evidence no weight. See: McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 [58] Such exigencies and practical solutions do not, however, excuse a failure by litigants to adhere to the rules of evidence. [59] Lawye......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 296,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...Psyllakis/Ellis Affidavits? 56 The court may strike all, or parts of, an affidavit containing inadmissible material: McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 at para. 108 citing Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, [1998] B.C.J. No. 2923 (BCSC) [In Chambers] at para. 57 Rule 22-2 provides......
  • 2023 BCSC 1176,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...party from testing the justification or explanation: Brown v. Clark Wilson LLP, 2014 BCCA 185 at paras. 26, 30, 37; McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 at paras. 165–168. Our Court of Appeal recently summarized the applicable test as follows: [23] The foregoing passages are settled law......
  • Tasci (Re), 2020 BCSC 1438
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2020
    ...usually addressed by the practicalities and exigencies of decision making by giving offending evidence no weight. See: McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 [58] Such exigencies and practical solutions do not, however, excuse a failure by litigants to adhere to the rules of evidence. [59] Lawye......
  • Barbieri Estate v White,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 11 Julio 2023
    ...party from testing the justification or explanation: Brown v. Clark Wilson LLP, 2014 BCCA 185 at paras. 26, 30, 37; McMahon v. Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 at paras. 165–168. Our Court of Appeal recently summarized the applicable test as follows: [23] The foregoing passages are settled law......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • THE TROUBLE WITH WIGMORE: A NEW APPROACH TO IMPLIED WAIVER OF SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 52 No. 1, January 2019
    • 1 Enero 2019
    ...at para 33). (83) See Procon Mining & Tunnelling Ltd v McNeil, 2009 BCCA 281 at para 18 [Procon]. (84) See McMahon v Harper, 2017 BCSC 2328 at para 166; R v Bruce Power Inc, 2005 CarswellOnt 12052 (CJ) at para 40; R v Husky Oil Inc, 2017 SKQB 383 at para 40. The opposing party should no......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT