Medos Services Corp. et al. v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 550

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeHarrington, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,EVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Citation[2013] F.T.R. Uned. 550,[2013] F.T.R. Uned. 550 (FC),2013 FC 1006
Date02 October 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Don’t Ignore That Notice!
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 21, 2013
    ...case Medos Services Corporation v. Ridout and Maybee LLP 2013 FC 1006 is an example of what happens when the owner of a registered trademark ignores a Section 45 notice. As a basic premise a registered trademark must be used in order to maintain those rights and a procedure exists under Sec......
  • Medos Services Corp. et al. v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, [2014] N.R. Uned. 124
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • September 11, 2014
    ...Sharlow, J.A. : Medos Services Corporation, Marathon Medical Inc. and Alexander Vlasseros have appealed the judgment of the Federal Court (2013 FC 1006). That judgment upheld the decision of the Registrar of Trade-Marks to expunge a trade-mark for non-use pursuant to section 45 of the Trade......
  • How to Lose Trade-mark Rights
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • October 8, 2013
    ...during the previous three years. No evidence, no trade-mark. In the recent case of Medos Services Corporation v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, 2013 FC 1006, the court reviewed a Section 45 challenge to the mark MEDOS. The trade-mark owner asserted its rights by tendering evidence such as various b......
  • How To Lose Trade-Mark Rights
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 9, 2013
    ...during the previous three years. No evidence, no trade-mark. In the recent case of Medos Services Corporation v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, 2013 FC 1006, the court reviewed a Section 45 challenge to the mark MEDOS. The trade-mark owner asserted its rights by tendering evidence such as various b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
  • Medos Services Corp. et al. v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, [2014] N.R. Uned. 124
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • September 11, 2014
    ...Sharlow, J.A. : Medos Services Corporation, Marathon Medical Inc. and Alexander Vlasseros have appealed the judgment of the Federal Court (2013 FC 1006). That judgment upheld the decision of the Registrar of Trade-Marks to expunge a trade-mark for non-use pursuant to section 45 of the Trade......
  • Medos Services Corp. et al. v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, [2015] N.R. Uned. 51
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 18, 2015
    ...second is whether the Federal Court judge erred in his analysis of what he described as "correspondence with foreign suppliers" (2013 FC 1006 at para. 9). [2] We can detect no error in the Federal Court judge's determination that the breach of natural justice alleged by the appell......
5 firm's commentaries
  • Don’t Ignore That Notice!
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 21, 2013
    ...case Medos Services Corporation v. Ridout and Maybee LLP 2013 FC 1006 is an example of what happens when the owner of a registered trademark ignores a Section 45 notice. As a basic premise a registered trademark must be used in order to maintain those rights and a procedure exists under Sec......
  • How to Lose Trade-mark Rights
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • October 8, 2013
    ...during the previous three years. No evidence, no trade-mark. In the recent case of Medos Services Corporation v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, 2013 FC 1006, the court reviewed a Section 45 challenge to the mark MEDOS. The trade-mark owner asserted its rights by tendering evidence such as various b......
  • How To Lose Trade-Mark Rights
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 9, 2013
    ...during the previous three years. No evidence, no trade-mark. In the recent case of Medos Services Corporation v. Ridout and Maybee LLP, 2013 FC 1006, the court reviewed a Section 45 challenge to the mark MEDOS. The trade-mark owner asserted its rights by tendering evidence such as various b......
  • Don’t Ignore that Notice!
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • November 13, 2013
    ...case Medos Services Corporation v. Ridout and Maybee LLP 2013 FC 1006 is an example of what happens when the owner of a registered trademark ignores a Section 45 notice. As a basic premise a registered trademark must be used in order to maintain those rights and a procedure exists under Sec......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT