Meekis v. Ontario,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Juriansz, van Rensburg and Sossin JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 534 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 534 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | C66971 |
| Date | 26 July 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 10 ' 14)
...v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89 , Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121 , Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, Burns v. RBC Life Insurance Company, 2020 ONCA 347 Sundial Homes (Sharon) Limited v. Wei, 2025 ONCA 102 Keywords: Contracts, Real Propert......
-
2025 ONCA 100,
...As held in Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121, 136 O.R. (3d) 654, at para. 15, and Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, 158 O.R. (3d) 1, at para. 16, a court assessing a r. 21.01(1)(b) motion is not required to assume that bald conclusory statements of fact are 48......
-
Rivard v Ontario,
...As held in Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121, 136 O.R. (3d) 654, at para. 15, and Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, 158 O.R. (3d) 1, at para. 16, a court assessing a r. 21.01(1)(b) motion is not required to assume that bald conclusory statements of fact are 48......
-
Manoharan v Taylor,
...No. 201) 173 The purpose of the tort of misfeasance in public office was described by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534 as follows: As Lord Steyn put it in Three Rivers District Council v. Bank of England (No. 3), [2000] 2 W.L.R. 1220 (U.K. H.L.), at 1230: “The......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
2025 ONCA 100,
...As held in Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121, 136 O.R. (3d) 654, at para. 15, and Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, 158 O.R. (3d) 1, at para. 16, a court assessing a r. 21.01(1)(b) motion is not required to assume that bald conclusory statements of fact are 48......
-
Rivard v Ontario,
...As held in Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121, 136 O.R. (3d) 654, at para. 15, and Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, 158 O.R. (3d) 1, at para. 16, a court assessing a r. 21.01(1)(b) motion is not required to assume that bald conclusory statements of fact are 48......
-
Chitaroni . Coleman (Township),
...a statutory duty to do so on the part of the Township, clearly missing the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, which I will expand upon below. These deficiencies in the materials and the arguments of counsel prevent me from fairly and justly adjudicat......
-
Wei v Ontario,
...8 To succeed on their misfeasance claim, the plaintiffs must show: See Ontario (AG) v Clark, 2021 SCC 18, at para 22; Meekis v Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, at para 73. Given that misfeasance is specifically enumerated in section 17(1), the plaintiffs obviously need leave to prosecute this cause ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 10 ' 14)
...v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2023 FCA 89 , Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121 , Meekis v. Ontario, 2021 ONCA 534, Burns v. RBC Life Insurance Company, 2020 ONCA 347 Sundial Homes (Sharon) Limited v. Wei, 2025 ONCA 102 Keywords: Contracts, Real Propert......