Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 417

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2022 FC 417
Date11 April 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Takeda Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2024 FC 106
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 7, 2024
    ...the claims, as construed, inventive, to facilitate the obviousness analysis (see also Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 417 [Pharmascience] at para [188] Takeda argues that the inventive concept is the expression of ‘why’ the claimed subject- matter is in......
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2023 FC 1149
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 25, 2023
    ...that the litigation resulting in Justice Furlanetto’s recent trial decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 417 [Sitagliptin] demonstrates the sort of prejudice that can result when the evidence of a patent owner’s invention story is served only af......
  • Form I: Crystal Form Patents In The Federal Court Of Canada ' A Review Of Case Law On Claims Construction And Selection Patents
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 29, 2022
    ...Succinate"); Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Novopharm Limited, 2009 FC 301 ("Raloxifene"); Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 417 ("Sitagliptin"); Les Laboratoires Servier v. Apotex Inc., 2019 FC 616 2 GlaxoSmithKline Inc et al. v. Genpharm Inc et al. (2003), 30 CPR (4th) 360......
  • Form II: Anticipation And Obviousness Of Crystal Form Patents In The Federal Court Of Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 27, 2022
    ...Desvenlafaxine-Teva supra at para. 39-40; FCA Desvenlafaxine-Apotex supra at para. 39 15. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 417 16. Sitagliptin supra at para. 183. 17. Sitagliptin supra at paras. 201-202. 18. Sitagliptin supra at para. 249. 19. Adama Makhteshim Ltd., 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
  • Takeda Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2024 FC 106
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 7, 2024
    ...the claims, as construed, inventive, to facilitate the obviousness analysis (see also Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 417 [Pharmascience] at para [188] Takeda argues that the inventive concept is the expression of ‘why’ the claimed subject- matter is in......
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2023 FC 1149
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 25, 2023
    ...that the litigation resulting in Justice Furlanetto’s recent trial decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Pharmascience Inc, 2022 FC 417 [Sitagliptin] demonstrates the sort of prejudice that can result when the evidence of a patent owner’s invention story is served only af......
6 firm's commentaries
  • Form I: Crystal Form Patents In The Federal Court Of Canada ' A Review Of Case Law On Claims Construction And Selection Patents
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 29, 2022
    ...Succinate"); Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Novopharm Limited, 2009 FC 301 ("Raloxifene"); Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 417 ("Sitagliptin"); Les Laboratoires Servier v. Apotex Inc., 2019 FC 616 2 GlaxoSmithKline Inc et al. v. Genpharm Inc et al. (2003), 30 CPR (4th) 360......
  • Form II: Anticipation And Obviousness Of Crystal Form Patents In The Federal Court Of Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 27, 2022
    ...Desvenlafaxine-Teva supra at para. 39-40; FCA Desvenlafaxine-Apotex supra at para. 39 15. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v. Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 417 16. Sitagliptin supra at para. 183. 17. Sitagliptin supra at paras. 201-202. 18. Sitagliptin supra at para. 249. 19. Adama Makhteshim Ltd., 2......
  • Canadian Patent Law: 2022 Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 17, 2023
    ...argument of invalidity in respect of a patent covering Merck's JANUVIA product was released in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Pharmascinence, (2022 FC 417). The patent at issue claimed, inter alia, an enantiomer of a particular salt and crystalline form of the active ingredient sitagliptin. That thi......
  • Federal Court finds salt patent valid in a PM(NOC) action regarding sitagliptin
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • April 20, 2022
    ...have been sufficient as of the filing date. *** Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v Pharmascience Inc., 2022 FC 417 an infringement action concerning sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate products under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the Regulations). The Court dismissed all......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT