Meydaner v. Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeTzimas J.
Citation2020 ONSC 3857
Date23 June 2020
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Docket NumberFS-13-77178
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Wallace v. Pichichero,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 20, 2021
    ...the Declaration Date when the exchange rate was higher than $1.2513: G.W.M. v. W.C.M., 2015 BCSC 1624 at para. 177; Meydaner v. Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857 at para. 211. Given this limitation in the evidence, I am unable to conclude that using the usual trial date rate is unjust. In C.S. v. C.......
  • 2023 ABCJ 114,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the exchange rate between CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence ......
  • Bato v Cano,
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • May 23, 2023
    ...of the exchange rate between CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence ......
  • Boelman v Boelman,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 27, 2023
    ...remained in effect and continues to this day. [40]           In Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, additional reasons 2020 ONSC 5574, the Court dealt with a similar situation where Mrs. Meydaner received a lump sum payment, as well as regu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Wallace v. Pichichero,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 20, 2021
    ...the Declaration Date when the exchange rate was higher than $1.2513: G.W.M. v. W.C.M., 2015 BCSC 1624 at para. 177; Meydaner v. Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857 at para. 211. Given this limitation in the evidence, I am unable to conclude that using the usual trial date rate is unjust. In C.S. v. C.......
  • 2023 ABCJ 114,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the exchange rate between CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence ......
  • Bato v Cano,
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • May 23, 2023
    ...of the exchange rate between CAD and USD; and in Mateychuk v Mateychuk, 2001 MBQB 219, Ball v Ball, 2012 BCSC 227, Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, and Mao v Rao, 2021 BCSC 2073, the courts took judicial notice of the USD to CAD exchange rates in the absence of there being any evidence ......
  • Boelman v Boelman,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 27, 2023
    ...remained in effect and continues to this day. [40]           In Meydaner v Meydaner, 2020 ONSC 3857, additional reasons 2020 ONSC 5574, the Court dealt with a similar situation where Mrs. Meydaner received a lump sum payment, as well as regu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT