MICHEL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, 2019 SKQB 209
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | BARRINGTON-FOOTE |
| Citation | 2019 SKQB 209 |
| Date | 26 August 2019 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | QB 2049 of 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Patel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee,
...billings when the necessary medical service was provided. See, for example: Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at paras 39-44; and Offiah at para 70. But that is not the case here where the Committee concluded billed services could not have been provided......
-
MITCHELL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE and MINISTER OF HEALTH (SASKATCHEWAN),
...any order the judge considers should have been made. [10] As pointed out in Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at para 10 [Michel], s. 49.21 of the Act does not specify the grounds upon which a physician may successfully challenge a decision made by the ......
-
Malhotra v. Joint Medical Professional Review Committee,
...As determined in Michel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209, the specific language of the Payment Schedule is important and the inclusion or exclusion of the records requirement indicates differing meanings. For example, Barrington-Foote J.A. (ex officio), confirmed......
-
Amu-Darko v. The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee and Minister of Health (Saskatchewan),
...In Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209, Barrington-Foote J.A. (ex officio) (as he then was) commented upon the records requirement when a doctor is requesting [38] The answer to the question of whether and to what extent the ......
4 cases
-
Patel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee,
...billings when the necessary medical service was provided. See, for example: Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at paras 39-44; and Offiah at para 70. But that is not the case here where the Committee concluded billed services could not have been provided......
-
MITCHELL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE and MINISTER OF HEALTH (SASKATCHEWAN),
...any order the judge considers should have been made. [10] As pointed out in Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at para 10 [Michel], s. 49.21 of the Act does not specify the grounds upon which a physician may successfully challenge a decision made by the ......
-
Malhotra v. Joint Medical Professional Review Committee,
...As determined in Michel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209, the specific language of the Payment Schedule is important and the inclusion or exclusion of the records requirement indicates differing meanings. For example, Barrington-Foote J.A. (ex officio), confirmed......
-
Amu-Darko v. The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee and Minister of Health (Saskatchewan),
...In Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209, Barrington-Foote J.A. (ex officio) (as he then was) commented upon the records requirement when a doctor is requesting [38] The answer to the question of whether and to what extent the ......