MICHEL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
JudgeBARRINGTON-FOOTE
Citation2019 SKQB 209
Docket NumberQB 2049 of 2015
Date26 August 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Patel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 10, 2022
    ...billings when the necessary medical service was provided. See, for example: Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at paras 39-44; and Offiah at para 70. But that is not the case here where the Committee concluded billed services could not have been provided......
  • MITCHELL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE and MINISTER OF HEALTH (SASKATCHEWAN)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • December 15, 2020
    ...any order the judge considers should have been made. [10] As pointed out in Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at para 10 [Michel], s. 49.21 of the Act does not specify the grounds upon which a physician may successfully challenge a decision made by the ......
  • Malhotra v. Joint Medical Professional Review Committee
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 6, 2022
    ...schedule, which in some cases includes a record requirement. [32] As determined in Michel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209, the specific language of the Payment Schedule is important and the inclusion or exclusion of the records requirement indicates differing me......
  • Izekor v. Joint Medical Professional Review Committee and Minister of Health (Saskatchewan)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 27, 2026
    ...Dr. Izekor points to the decision in Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 [Michel]. In that case, the committee reassessed the doctor’s billings based, among other things, on the clinical content and legibility of his documentation. Justice Barrington-Foot......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Patel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 10, 2022
    ...billings when the necessary medical service was provided. See, for example: Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at paras 39-44; and Offiah at para 70. But that is not the case here where the Committee concluded billed services could not have been provided......
  • MITCHELL v. THE JOINT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW COMMITTEE and MINISTER OF HEALTH (SASKATCHEWAN)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • December 15, 2020
    ...any order the judge considers should have been made. [10] As pointed out in Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 at para 10 [Michel], s. 49.21 of the Act does not specify the grounds upon which a physician may successfully challenge a decision made by the ......
  • Malhotra v. Joint Medical Professional Review Committee
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 6, 2022
    ...schedule, which in some cases includes a record requirement. [32] As determined in Michel v Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209, the specific language of the Payment Schedule is important and the inclusion or exclusion of the records requirement indicates differing me......
  • Izekor v. Joint Medical Professional Review Committee and Minister of Health (Saskatchewan)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 27, 2026
    ...Dr. Izekor points to the decision in Michel v The Joint Medical Professional Review Committee, 2019 SKQB 209 [Michel]. In that case, the committee reassessed the doctor’s billings based, among other things, on the clinical content and legibility of his documentation. Justice Barrington-Foot......
  • Get Started for Free