Micka v. Oliver & District Community Economic Development Society et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 678

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeRoss, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE
Citation[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 678,2009 BCSC 678,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 678 (SC)
Date21 May 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • MicroCoal Inc. et al. v. Livneh et al., 2014 BCSC 1288
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 14, 2014
    ...whether they could be substantiated" (at para. 18). ∙ Micka v. Oliver & District Community Economic Development Society , 2009 BCSC 678: The statement of claim contained allegations of very serious wrong doing against the defendants with respect to the sale of certain public......
  • Froese v. Sharif,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...will not necessarily excuse reprehensible conduct: Micka v. Oliver & District Community Economic Development Society, 2009 BCSC 678 at para. 6. The comments of the court regarding the defendant in M.P. v. N.M., 2009 BCSC 40 at para. 30 apply equally to Mr. Sharif in this [30] … the defe......
  • Schlotfeldt v. Schlotfeldt, [2011] B.C.A.C. Uned. 44
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 17, 2011
    ...of assets should be determined based on South African law, and adjourned that question so that the parties could obtain expert evidence (2009 BCSC 678 at paras. 49-50). At the resumption of the trial, the appellant produced expert evidence that the law entitled him to a 100% interest in the......
  • McKenny v. McKenny, 2009 ABQB 551
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 24, 2009
    ...976 (SCC) [10] By the court: On the issue of jurisdiction: D.P. M. v S.D. [2008] O.J. No. 4539 (Fam.Ct.); Schlotfeldt v Schlotfeldt 2009 BCSC 678 1. Summary [11] The parties are the parents of two special needs children. [12] The parties divorced in 2002. There were various disputes between......
4 cases
  • MicroCoal Inc. et al. v. Livneh et al., 2014 BCSC 1288
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 14, 2014
    ...whether they could be substantiated" (at para. 18). ∙ Micka v. Oliver & District Community Economic Development Society , 2009 BCSC 678: The statement of claim contained allegations of very serious wrong doing against the defendants with respect to the sale of certain public......
  • Froese v. Sharif,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 26, 2021
    ...will not necessarily excuse reprehensible conduct: Micka v. Oliver & District Community Economic Development Society, 2009 BCSC 678 at para. 6. The comments of the court regarding the defendant in M.P. v. N.M., 2009 BCSC 40 at para. 30 apply equally to Mr. Sharif in this [30] … the defe......
  • Schlotfeldt v. Schlotfeldt, [2011] B.C.A.C. Uned. 44
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 17, 2011
    ...of assets should be determined based on South African law, and adjourned that question so that the parties could obtain expert evidence (2009 BCSC 678 at paras. 49-50). At the resumption of the trial, the appellant produced expert evidence that the law entitled him to a 100% interest in the......
  • McKenny v. McKenny, 2009 ABQB 551
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 24, 2009
    ...976 (SCC) [10] By the court: On the issue of jurisdiction: D.P. M. v S.D. [2008] O.J. No. 4539 (Fam.Ct.); Schlotfeldt v Schlotfeldt 2009 BCSC 678 1. Summary [11] The parties are the parents of two special needs children. [12] The parties divorced in 2002. There were various disputes between......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT