Miller v. Canada, 2019 FCA 61
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FCA 61 |
| Date | 01 April 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Bigeagle v. Canada, 2023 FCA 128
...subject to review on the standard set out in Housen (Ramos v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 205 at para. 21; Miller v. Canada, 2019 FCA 61 at para. 10; Heli Tech Services (Canada) Ltd. v. Weyerhaeuser Company Limited, 2011 FCA 193 at para. C. Grounds of Appeal [28] While the groun......
-
Winkler v. Hendley,
...As is often said, parties to a summary judgment motion have an obligation to put their “best foot forward”: Miller v Canada, 2019 FCA 61 at paras 17, 40. In my view, this includes conducting whatever factual investigations they consider necessary to pursue or defend the motion......
2 cases
-
Bigeagle v. Canada, 2023 FCA 128
...subject to review on the standard set out in Housen (Ramos v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 205 at para. 21; Miller v. Canada, 2019 FCA 61 at para. 10; Heli Tech Services (Canada) Ltd. v. Weyerhaeuser Company Limited, 2011 FCA 193 at para. C. Grounds of Appeal [28] While the groun......
-
Winkler v. Hendley,
...As is often said, parties to a summary judgment motion have an obligation to put their “best foot forward”: Miller v Canada, 2019 FCA 61 at paras 17, 40. In my view, this includes conducting whatever factual investigations they consider necessary to pursue or defend the motion......