MILLER v. SASKATCHEWAN AND ARBORFIELD CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AREA AUTHORITY, 2020 SKQB 8

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeGOEBEL J.
Citation2020 SKQB 8
Docket NumberQBG 87 of 2012
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Date13 January 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • PEDIGREE POULTRY LTD. v. SASKATCHEWAN BROILER HATCHING EGG PRODUCERS’ MARKETING BOARD,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 3 Abril 2020
    ...SKCA 141, 302 Sask R 289; Barbagianis v Canada (Attorney General), 2008 SKQB 516 at paras 10-11, 340 Sask R 276; Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 33. [233] Statutory immunity provisions which extend protection on the terms of s. 27 of the Act have been interpreted in substantially......
  • WESSING v. KUNITZ,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 27 Mayo 2020
    ...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27. [34]                From these authorities, it is apparent the list of governing principles in a summary j......
  • KUFFNER v. JACQUES (ESTATE),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 18 Enero 2023
    ...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27, 12 RPR (6th) 191. [21]                          &#x......
3 cases
  • PEDIGREE POULTRY LTD. v. SASKATCHEWAN BROILER HATCHING EGG PRODUCERS’ MARKETING BOARD, 2020 SKQB 100
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 3 Abril 2020
    ...SKCA 141, 302 Sask R 289; Barbagianis v Canada (Attorney General), 2008 SKQB 516 at paras 10-11, 340 Sask R 276; Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 33. [233] Statutory immunity provisions which extend protection on the terms of s. 27 of the Act have been interpreted in substantially......
  • WESSING v. KUNITZ, 2020 SKQB 153
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 27 Mayo 2020
    ...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27. [34]                From these authorities, it is apparent the list of governing principles in a summary j......
  • KUFFNER v. JACQUES (ESTATE),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 18 Enero 2023
    ...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27, 12 RPR (6th) 191. [21]                          &#x......