MILLER v. SASKATCHEWAN AND ARBORFIELD CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AREA AUTHORITY
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | GOEBEL J. |
| Date | 13 January 2020 |
| Docket Number | QBG 87 of 2012 |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 8 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
PEDIGREE POULTRY LTD. v. SASKATCHEWAN BROILER HATCHING EGG PRODUCERS’ MARKETING BOARD,
...SKCA 141, 302 Sask R 289; Barbagianis v Canada (Attorney General), 2008 SKQB 516 at paras 10-11, 340 Sask R 276; Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 33. [233] Statutory immunity provisions which extend protection on the terms of s. 27 of the Act have been interpreted in substantially......
-
WESSING v. KUNITZ,
...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27. [34] From these authorities, it is apparent the list of governing principles in a summary j......
-
KUFFNER v. JACQUES (ESTATE),
...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27, 12 RPR (6th) 191. [21] &#x......
3 cases
-
PEDIGREE POULTRY LTD. v. SASKATCHEWAN BROILER HATCHING EGG PRODUCERS’ MARKETING BOARD,
...SKCA 141, 302 Sask R 289; Barbagianis v Canada (Attorney General), 2008 SKQB 516 at paras 10-11, 340 Sask R 276; Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 33. [233] Statutory immunity provisions which extend protection on the terms of s. 27 of the Act have been interpreted in substantially......
-
WESSING v. KUNITZ,
...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27. [34] From these authorities, it is apparent the list of governing principles in a summary j......
-
KUFFNER v. JACQUES (ESTATE),
...This helpful discussion in Lane Realty was also relied upon in Miller v Saskatchewan, 2020 SKQB 8 at para 27, 12 RPR (6th) 191. [21] &#x......