Mitchell v Pytel
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice W.N. Renke |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 403 |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 403 |
| Docket Number | 0703 08593 |
| Date | 21 May 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 practice notes
-
McDonald v Sproule Management GP Limited
...Fitzpatrick v The College of Physical Therapists of Alberta, 2020 ABCA 164 at para 22; ANC Timber, at para 60; Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403 at para [96] Fourth, bald, conclusory, argumentative or self-serving statements, personal opinion, allegations, speculation, conjecture or assertion......
-
Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
...the common assumption, to a suicient extent, rather than merely 45 Ibid at para 59 [emphasis in original]. 46 See also Mitchell v Pytel , 2021 ABQB 403 at paras 347–48. The mutual assumption must low from some mutual action, not merely mutual ignorance. 47 Tinkler , above note 21. Speciic P......
-
Table of cases
...949 F2d 1052 (1991) ........................................................................................... 379 Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403 .......................................................................448 Modry v Alberta Health Services, 2015 ABCA 265 ...........................
-
Bowes v McCubbin
...Network Inc, 2012 ABQB 559; Kydd v Abolarin, 2011 ABQB 690; Milota v Momentive Specialty Chemicals, 2020 ABCA 413; Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403; Nasrin Karim Professional Corporation v Bank of Nova Scotia, 2007 ABCA 10; Stack v Hildebrand, 2010 ABCA 108; Steinkrauss v Afridi, 2013 ABCA 4......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
McDonald v Sproule Management GP Limited
...Fitzpatrick v The College of Physical Therapists of Alberta, 2020 ABCA 164 at para 22; ANC Timber, at para 60; Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403 at para [96] Fourth, bald, conclusory, argumentative or self-serving statements, personal opinion, allegations, speculation, conjecture or assertion......
-
Bowes v McCubbin
...Network Inc, 2012 ABQB 559; Kydd v Abolarin, 2011 ABQB 690; Milota v Momentive Specialty Chemicals, 2020 ABCA 413; Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403; Nasrin Karim Professional Corporation v Bank of Nova Scotia, 2007 ABCA 10; Stack v Hildebrand, 2010 ABCA 108; Steinkrauss v Afridi, 2013 ABCA 4......
-
Simmons v Homes by Avia (Edmonton) GP Inc
...Section 6; Uber Technologies Inc v Heller, 2020 SCC 16; Limitations Act, RSA 2000, c L-12, Section 3.1 and Section 11; Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403; Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd v Abe’s Door Service Ltd, 2005 ABQB 731, aff’d, 2006 ABCA 243; Aseniwuche Winewak Nation of Canada v Ackroy......
-
Big Country Outdoor Superstore Inc v. Robertson
...LLP v New Brunswick, 2021 SCC 31; Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7; Lay v Lay, 2017 ABQB 29; Lay v Lay, 2019 ABCA 21; Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403; Owners: Condominium Plan No. 0625385 v Oxford Grande Ltd, 2017 ABQB 316; Peixeiro v Haberman, 1997 CanLII 325 (SCC), [1997] 3 SCR 549; Ryan v M......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
When Can An Electronic Message Extend A Limitation Period In Alberta?
...Alberta Ltd., 2012 ABQB 604, at para. 18; Twinn v. Sawridge Band, 2017 ABQB 366, at paras. 105-106 and 115-116 6. Mitchell v. Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403, at para. 328; Thompson Bros. (Constr.) Ltd. v. 823334 Alberta Ltd., 2012 ABQB 604, at para. 18; Harvest Operations Corp. v. Obsidian Energy Ltd......
2 books & journal articles
-
Specific Performance: Discretionary Defences and Considerations that Affect Discretion
...the common assumption, to a suicient extent, rather than merely 45 Ibid at para 59 [emphasis in original]. 46 See also Mitchell v Pytel , 2021 ABQB 403 at paras 347–48. The mutual assumption must low from some mutual action, not merely mutual ignorance. 47 Tinkler , above note 21. Speciic P......
-
Table of cases
...949 F2d 1052 (1991) ........................................................................................... 379 Mitchell v Pytel, 2021 ABQB 403 .......................................................................448 Modry v Alberta Health Services, 2015 ABCA 265 ...........................
