Mohammed v. Makhlouta,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeKIMMEL J.
Citation2020 ONSC 7494
Docket NumberCV-19-00627862
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date03 December 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 14, 2022 ' November 18, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2022
    ...v. North American Life Assurance Co., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 325, Indcondo Building Corp. v. Sloan, 2014 ONSC 4018, Mohammed v. Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494 facts: The respondents are judgment creditors of TH and SH (the "Hutchens"). The Hutchens live in Ontario and their known assets are in Ontario.......
  • Suevilia Development Corporation v. Liang
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 24, 2022
    ...plaintiff someone with a claim for damages who would rank as a creditor.  See Indcondo at paras. 45-48 and Mohammed v. Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494 at paras. [49]        Courts have found that, in some circumstances, it is not necessary for there to be a......
  • Joshi et Al v Osmi Homes Inc. et Al
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 27, 2025
    ...et al v Dass et al, 2019 ONSC 6599 at paras 40-41. 25 Inuka Developer Inc., 2145499 Ontario Inc. and Osmi9 Ltd. 26 Mohammed v Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494 at para 18, and Shute v Permier Trust Co, supra note 61 at para at para 46 and 27 2324702 Ontario v. 1305 Dundas, 2019 ONSC 1885, at para 2......
  • Stevens v. Hutchens
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 14, 2022
    ...creditors of the debtor: Indcondo Building Corp. v. Sloan, 2014 ONSC 4018, 121 O.R. (3d) 160, at para 45; Mohammed v. Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494, at para. 45. But in our view, “others” could also include creditors of the mortgagor corporation’s sole principal, in circums......
  • Get Started for Free
3 cases
  • Suevilia Development Corporation v. Liang
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 24, 2022
    ...plaintiff someone with a claim for damages who would rank as a creditor.  See Indcondo at paras. 45-48 and Mohammed v. Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494 at paras. [49]        Courts have found that, in some circumstances, it is not necessary for there to be a......
  • Stevens v. Hutchens
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 14, 2022
    ...creditors of the debtor: Indcondo Building Corp. v. Sloan, 2014 ONSC 4018, 121 O.R. (3d) 160, at para 45; Mohammed v. Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494, at para. 45. But in our view, “others” could also include creditors of the mortgagor corporation’s sole principal, in circums......
  • Stevens et al. v. Hutchens et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 9, 2022
    ...must rebut the presumption of an intention to defeat other creditors by the registration of its Mortgages: see Mohammed v. Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494. It has not done so for reasons which are set out [40]        Klenda knew the history of the Hutchens. Inde......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 14, 2022 ' November 18, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2022
    ...v. North American Life Assurance Co., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 325, Indcondo Building Corp. v. Sloan, 2014 ONSC 4018, Mohammed v. Makhlouta, 2020 ONSC 7494 facts: The respondents are judgment creditors of TH and SH (the "Hutchens"). The Hutchens live in Ontario and their known assets are in Ontario.......