Mudrick Capital Management LP v. Lightstream Resources LTD, 2016 ABCA 401

JudgeWakeling
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Case DateFriday December 16, 2016
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2016 ABCA 401

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 practice notes
  • R. v. Fuhr,, 2017 ABCA 266
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 11, 2017
    ...I came to this conclusion in a Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act case, Mudrick Capital Management LP v. Lightstream Resources Ltd., 2016 ABCA 401, ¶62; 43 C.B.R. 6th 175, 208 (chambers): “I am completely satisfied that the applicants’ position is without merit and is bound to fail”. See ......
  • Uhuegbulem v Timpano,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 15, 2025
    ...2022 ABCA 56 at para 20. “Appeals are expensive and introduce delay”: Mudrick Capital Management LP v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2016 ABCA 401 at para 25 Here, an assessment officer and a judge of the Court of King's Bench, sitting as an appeal judge, have carefully reviewed the legal fees ......
  • Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 14, 2025
    ...2022 ABCA 56 at para 20. “Appeals are expensive and introduce delay”: Mudrick Capital Management LP v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2016 ABCA 401 at para 11. Here, a review officer and a judge of the Court of King's Bench, acting as an appeal court, have already carefully reviewed the retainer......
  • DGDP-BC Holdings v Third Eye Capital Corp, PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2021 ABCA 33
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 29, 2021
    ...Ltd., 1997 ABCA 273, ¶ 12; 206 A.R. 295, 299 (chambers). See also Mudrick Capital Management LP v. Lightstream Resources Ltd., 2016 ABCA 401, ¶¶ 48-63; 43 C.B.R. 6th 175, 201-09 [5] See Harper v. Canada, 2000 SCC 57, ¶ 4; [2000] 2 S.C.R. 764, 768; RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. C......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • R. v. Fuhr,, 2017 ABCA 266
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 11, 2017
    ...I came to this conclusion in a Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act case, Mudrick Capital Management LP v. Lightstream Resources Ltd., 2016 ABCA 401, ¶62; 43 C.B.R. 6th 175, 208 (chambers): “I am completely satisfied that the applicants’ position is without merit and is bound to fail”. See ......
  • Uhuegbulem v Timpano,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 15, 2025
    ...2022 ABCA 56 at para 20. “Appeals are expensive and introduce delay”: Mudrick Capital Management LP v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2016 ABCA 401 at para 25 Here, an assessment officer and a judge of the Court of King's Bench, sitting as an appeal judge, have carefully reviewed the legal fees ......
  • Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 14, 2025
    ...2022 ABCA 56 at para 20. “Appeals are expensive and introduce delay”: Mudrick Capital Management LP v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2016 ABCA 401 at para 11. Here, a review officer and a judge of the Court of King's Bench, acting as an appeal court, have already carefully reviewed the retainer......
  • DGDP-BC Holdings v Third Eye Capital Corp, PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2021 ABCA 33
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 29, 2021
    ...Ltd., 1997 ABCA 273, ¶ 12; 206 A.R. 295, 299 (chambers). See also Mudrick Capital Management LP v. Lightstream Resources Ltd., 2016 ABCA 401, ¶¶ 48-63; 43 C.B.R. 6th 175, 201-09 [5] See Harper v. Canada, 2000 SCC 57, ¶ 4; [2000] 2 S.C.R. 764, 768; RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. C......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries