Murphy v. Murphy, [2015] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 17 (SC)
| Judge | Jollimore, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 10, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Citations | [2015] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 17 (SC);2015 NSSC 41;[2015] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 17 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Calder v. Calder,
...as such is no different from other passive investment accounts that the Court has always treated as matrimonial assets (Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 NSSC 41). She submits nothing that was held in TROD at the time of separation was being held for immediate gain in an entrepreneurial sense, rather ......
-
Murphy v. Murphy, 2018 NSSC 108
...applied to enforce the provisions of the Corollary Relief Order granted by the Decision released on February 10th, 2015. (Murphy v. Murphy 2015 NSSC 41.) [9] The Applicant has not received her equalization payment as ordered. She seeks relief pursuant to Civil Procedure Rules 80.02(1) and 8......
-
Chipman v Chipman, 2017 NSSC 297
...of assets has been dealt with several times by the Supreme Court and the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. Recently in Murphy v Murphy, 2015 NSSC 41 (“Murphy”), beginning at para. 20, the court noted that s. 41 of the Matrimonial Property Act defines matrimonial assets as the matrimonial home an......
3 cases
-
Calder v. Calder,
...as such is no different from other passive investment accounts that the Court has always treated as matrimonial assets (Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 NSSC 41). She submits nothing that was held in TROD at the time of separation was being held for immediate gain in an entrepreneurial sense, rather ......
-
Murphy v. Murphy, 2018 NSSC 108
...applied to enforce the provisions of the Corollary Relief Order granted by the Decision released on February 10th, 2015. (Murphy v. Murphy 2015 NSSC 41.) [9] The Applicant has not received her equalization payment as ordered. She seeks relief pursuant to Civil Procedure Rules 80.02(1) and 8......
-
Chipman v Chipman, 2017 NSSC 297
...of assets has been dealt with several times by the Supreme Court and the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. Recently in Murphy v Murphy, 2015 NSSC 41 (“Murphy”), beginning at para. 20, the court noted that s. 41 of the Matrimonial Property Act defines matrimonial assets as the matrimonial home an......