N.J. v. Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement (Alta.), 2016 ABPC 47
| Judge | Redman, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | GUARDIAN AND WARD |
| Citation | 2016 ABPC 47 |
| Date | 24 February 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
TS (Re),
...of s 35.1 of the CYFEA: (a) A(HM) (Re), 2015 ABPC 29 (“HM”); (b) NJ v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2016 ABPC 47 (“NJ”); (c) CW (Re), 2016 ABPC 239 (“CW”); and (d) Catholic Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto v M(C), [1994] 2 SCR 165 (“MC”). [168] C......
-
N.S., Re, 2016 ABPC 203
...to refer the Court to two nearly competing decisions out of this decision: NJ v. Alberta (Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) , 2016 ABPC 47, a decision by His Honour Judge D.G. Redman, out of Medicine Hat; and, HMA (Re) 2015 ABPC 29, a decision by her Honour L.T.L. Cook-Stanhope, o......
-
JJ (Re),
...Additionally, in NJ v Alberta (Director of the Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act), 2016 ABPC 47, Judge Redman (as he then was) further summarized the Director’s shifting priorities in a pre-PGO versus post-PGO situation at para [72] I am satisfied that the presumptions containe......
-
OS (Re),
...without the child being aware of such an application. See, for example, NJ v Alberta, (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2016 ABPC 47. [62] At the first stage, the Court should, before a full hearing is commenced, be satisfied by t......
4 cases
-
TS (Re),
...of s 35.1 of the CYFEA: (a) A(HM) (Re), 2015 ABPC 29 (“HM”); (b) NJ v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2016 ABPC 47 (“NJ”); (c) CW (Re), 2016 ABPC 239 (“CW”); and (d) Catholic Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto v M(C), [1994] 2 SCR 165 (“MC”). [168] C......
-
N.S., Re, 2016 ABPC 203
...to refer the Court to two nearly competing decisions out of this decision: NJ v. Alberta (Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) , 2016 ABPC 47, a decision by His Honour Judge D.G. Redman, out of Medicine Hat; and, HMA (Re) 2015 ABPC 29, a decision by her Honour L.T.L. Cook-Stanhope, o......
-
JJ (Re),
...Additionally, in NJ v Alberta (Director of the Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act), 2016 ABPC 47, Judge Redman (as he then was) further summarized the Director’s shifting priorities in a pre-PGO versus post-PGO situation at para [72] I am satisfied that the presumptions containe......
-
OS (Re),
...without the child being aware of such an application. See, for example, NJ v Alberta, (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2016 ABPC 47. [62] At the first stage, the Court should, before a full hearing is commenced, be satisfied by t......