Naidu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2006] F.T.R. Uned. 662 (FC)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Barnes, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE,COURTS,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | [2006] F.T.R. Uned. 662 (FC),2006 FC 1103,[2006] F.T.R. Uned. 662 |
| Date | 18 September 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Sharma v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 543
...of detail on this issue in the highlights report, it is a consequence of a lack of attention paid to it by Mr. Sharma. In Naidu v Canada , 2006 FC 1103, [2006] FCJ No 1392, the Court addressed the failure of an applicant to make out a best interests case in the following way: 17 Notwithstan......
-
Lupsa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 894 (FC)
...... (Exhibit P-1, Submissions of November 26, 2008, pages 19-20) [22] In Naidu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 1103, 151 A.C.W.S. (3d) 501, concerning a PRRA application, this Court wrote the following with respect to the burden to be met regarding the child's ......
-
Chung v. Can. (M.C.I.), 2015 FC 1329
...is required when seeking H&C relief based on the best interests of a child: Naidu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 1103 at para 17 [ Naidu ]. (3) Consideration of the Evidence [48] The Respondent upholds its assertion that the IAD considered and assigned appr......
3 cases
-
Sharma v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 543
...of detail on this issue in the highlights report, it is a consequence of a lack of attention paid to it by Mr. Sharma. In Naidu v Canada , 2006 FC 1103, [2006] FCJ No 1392, the Court addressed the failure of an applicant to make out a best interests case in the following way: 17 Notwithstan......
-
Lupsa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 894 (FC)
...... (Exhibit P-1, Submissions of November 26, 2008, pages 19-20) [22] In Naidu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 1103, 151 A.C.W.S. (3d) 501, concerning a PRRA application, this Court wrote the following with respect to the burden to be met regarding the child's ......
-
Chung v. Can. (M.C.I.), 2015 FC 1329
...is required when seeking H&C relief based on the best interests of a child: Naidu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 1103 at para 17 [ Naidu ]. (3) Consideration of the Evidence [48] The Respondent upholds its assertion that the IAD considered and assigned appr......