National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Hourigan, Trotter and Jamal JJ.A. |
Citation | 2020 ONCA 677 |
Date | 27 October 2020 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Docket Number | M51714 (C68496) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 14 ' 18)
...Rules 2.1.01, 2.1, 2.1.01, Visic v. Elia Associates Professional Corporation, 2020 ONCA 690, National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, Morier and Boily v. Rivard, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 716, Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1, Fitzgerald v. Reaum......
-
Ahmed v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 427
...as “frivolous” under r. 2.1.01(1) where the action is completely devoid of merit: National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5; Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, at para. 3. The motion judge was entitled to find that the claim here was frivolous because there co......
-
National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2021 ONSC 7436
...who found Mr. Guibord to have “behaved unreasonably”, as well as a full panel of the Court of Appeal (reported at 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5), which found an appeal by him to be “frivolous because it is completely devoid of merit” and awarded costs of $5,000 again......
2 cases
-
Ahmed v. Ontario (Attorney General),
...as “frivolous” under r. 2.1.01(1) where the action is completely devoid of merit: National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5; Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, at para. 3. The motion judge was entitled to find that the claim here was frivolous because there co......
-
National Bank of Canada v. Guibord,
...who found Mr. Guibord to have “behaved unreasonably”, as well as a full panel of the Court of Appeal (reported at 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5), which found an appeal by him to be “frivolous because it is completely devoid of merit” and awarded costs of $5,000 again......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 14 ' 18)
...Rules 2.1.01, 2.1, 2.1.01, Visic v. Elia Associates Professional Corporation, 2020 ONCA 690, National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, Morier and Boily v. Rivard, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 716, Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1, Fitzgerald v. Reaum......