National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHourigan, Trotter and Jamal JJ.A.
Date27 October 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberM51714 (C68496)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 14 ' 18)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 23, 2021
    ...Rules 2.1.01, 2.1, 2.1.01, Visic v. Elia Associates Professional Corporation, 2020 ONCA 690, National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, Morier and Boily v. Rivard, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 716, Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1, Fitzgerald v. Reaum......
  • Ahmed v. Ontario (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 16, 2021
    ...as “frivolous” under r. 2.1.01(1) where the action is completely devoid of merit: National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5; Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, at para. 3. The motion judge was entitled to find that the claim here was frivolous because there co......
  • National Bank of Canada v. Guibord,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...who found Mr. Guibord to have “behaved unreasonably”, as well as a full panel of the Court of Appeal (reported at 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5), which found an appeal by him to be “frivolous because it is completely devoid of merit” and awarded costs of $5,000 again......
2 cases
  • Ahmed v. Ontario (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 16, 2021
    ...as “frivolous” under r. 2.1.01(1) where the action is completely devoid of merit: National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5; Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, at para. 3. The motion judge was entitled to find that the claim here was frivolous because there co......
  • National Bank of Canada v. Guibord,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...who found Mr. Guibord to have “behaved unreasonably”, as well as a full panel of the Court of Appeal (reported at 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5), which found an appeal by him to be “frivolous because it is completely devoid of merit” and awarded costs of $5,000 again......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 14 ' 18)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 23, 2021
    ...Rules 2.1.01, 2.1, 2.1.01, Visic v. Elia Associates Professional Corporation, 2020 ONCA 690, National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, Morier and Boily v. Rivard, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 716, Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1, Fitzgerald v. Reaum......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT