National Bank of Canada v. Guibord
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Hourigan, Trotter and Jamal JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 677 |
| Date | 27 October 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | M51714 (C68496) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 14 ' 18)
...Rules 2.1.01, 2.1, 2.1.01, Visic v. Elia Associates Professional Corporation, 2020 ONCA 690, National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, Morier and Boily v. Rivard, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 716, Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1, Fitzgerald v. Reaum......
-
Ahmed v. Ontario (Attorney General),
...as “frivolous” under r. 2.1.01(1) where the action is completely devoid of merit: National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5; Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, at para. 3. The motion judge was entitled to find that the claim here was frivolous because there co......
-
National Bank of Canada v. Guibord,
...who found Mr. Guibord to have “behaved unreasonably”, as well as a full panel of the Court of Appeal (reported at 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5), which found an appeal by him to be “frivolous because it is completely devoid of merit” and awarded costs of $5,000 again......
2 cases
-
Ahmed v. Ontario (Attorney General)
...as “frivolous” under r. 2.1.01(1) where the action is completely devoid of merit: National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5; Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, at para. 3. The motion judge was entitled to find that the claim here was frivolous because there co......
-
National Bank of Canada v. Guibord
...who found Mr. Guibord to have “behaved unreasonably”, as well as a full panel of the Court of Appeal (reported at 2020 ONCA 677, at para. 5), which found an appeal by him to be “frivolous because it is completely devoid of merit” and awarded costs of $5,000 again......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 14 ' 18)
...Rules 2.1.01, 2.1, 2.1.01, Visic v. Elia Associates Professional Corporation, 2020 ONCA 690, National Bank of Canada v. Guibord, 2020 ONCA 677, Rallis v. Myers, 2019 ONCA 437, Morier and Boily v. Rivard, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 716, Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1, Fitzgerald v. Reaum......