Navaratnam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 856
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Shore, J. |
| Citation | 2011 FC 856,[2011] F.T.R. Uned. 505,[2011] F.T.R. Uned. 505 (FC) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,EVIDENCE |
| Date | 12 July 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
Baloch v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1373
...statements to immigration authorities at the POE may be considered by the RPD (Navaratnam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 856 at para 15). One or more material omissions and inconsistencies among an applicant’s POE notes, basis of claim narrative and oral testimony at......
-
Sbayti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1296
...answers to very specific questions and then look to correct the record after the fact (Navaratnam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 856 [Navaratnam]). [44] But that is not the case here. There is evidence to seriously suggest that the Applicant answered the Question correctly ......
-
Sanaei v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 172 (FC)
...actually hearing the evidence and observing the demeanour of the witness ( Navaratnam v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2011 FC 856 at para 22; Chen v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [1999] FCJ 551 , 240 NR 376 ). [64] The Board made an overarching cr......
-
Lawani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 924
...readiness to answer, coherence and consistency of oral testimony before them (Navaratnam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 856 at para 23). In addition, the RPD benefits from the specialized knowledge of its members to assess evidence relating to facts stemming from their fiel......
Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
-
Baloch v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1373
...statements to immigration authorities at the POE may be considered by the RPD (Navaratnam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 856 at para 15). One or more material omissions and inconsistencies among an applicant’s POE notes, basis of claim narrative and oral testimony at......
-
Sbayti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1296
...answers to very specific questions and then look to correct the record after the fact (Navaratnam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 856 [Navaratnam]). [44] But that is not the case here. There is evidence to seriously suggest that the Applicant answered the Question correctly ......
-
Sanaei v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 172 (FC)
...actually hearing the evidence and observing the demeanour of the witness ( Navaratnam v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2011 FC 856 at para 22; Chen v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [1999] FCJ 551 , 240 NR 376 ). [64] The Board made an overarching cr......
-
Lawani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 924
...readiness to answer, coherence and consistency of oral testimony before them (Navaratnam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 856 at para 23). In addition, the RPD benefits from the specialized knowledge of its members to assess evidence relating to facts stemming from their fiel......
Request a trial to view additional results