Neigum v Van Seggelen,

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeKalmakoff,Schwann,Tholl
Citation2022 SKCA 108
Docket NumberCACV3842
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date05 October 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Smiley Farming Company Ltd v John Deere Financial Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 5, 2025
    ...the determination of whether a contract has been formed between two parties. Citing this Court's decision in Neigum v Van Seggelen, 2022 SKCA 108, 474 DLR (4th) 673, he noted that “[f]or a contract to exist there must be a meeting of minds with respect to its essential terms” ( Decision at ......
  • Khaira v 102007987 Saskatchewan Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 8, 2024
    ...for correctness ( Sattva Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 at para 53, [2014] 2 SCR 633, cited in Neigum v Van Seggelen, 2022 SKCA 108 at para 46, 474 DLR (4th) 673). That is a legal standard. The application of that legal standard to the facts of the case is also a question o......
  • Achter Land & Cattle Ltd v South West Terminal Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 16, 2024
    ...… (Footnotes omitted) See also Harle v 101090442 Saskatchewan Ltd., 2014 SKCA 6 at para 41, 433 Sask R 62; Neigum v Van Seggelen, 2022 SKCA 108 at paras 54–57, 474 DLR (4th) 673; and Bawitko Investments Ltd. v Kernels Popcorn Ltd. (1991), 79 DLR (4th) 97 at 104 (Ont 174 Here, we are concern......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Smiley Farming Company Ltd v John Deere Financial Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 5, 2025
    ...the determination of whether a contract has been formed between two parties. Citing this Court's decision in Neigum v Van Seggelen, 2022 SKCA 108, 474 DLR (4th) 673, he noted that “[f]or a contract to exist there must be a meeting of minds with respect to its essential terms” ( Decision at ......
  • Khaira v 102007987 Saskatchewan Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 8, 2024
    ...for correctness ( Sattva Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 at para 53, [2014] 2 SCR 633, cited in Neigum v Van Seggelen, 2022 SKCA 108 at para 46, 474 DLR (4th) 673). That is a legal standard. The application of that legal standard to the facts of the case is also a question o......
  • Achter Land & Cattle Ltd v South West Terminal Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 16, 2024
    ...… (Footnotes omitted) See also Harle v 101090442 Saskatchewan Ltd., 2014 SKCA 6 at para 41, 433 Sask R 62; Neigum v Van Seggelen, 2022 SKCA 108 at paras 54–57, 474 DLR (4th) 673; and Bawitko Investments Ltd. v Kernels Popcorn Ltd. (1991), 79 DLR (4th) 97 at 104 (Ont 174 Here, we are concern......
  • Boutin v Boutin,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...that relating to contract interpretation: Ruskin v Chutskoff Estate, 2004 SKCA 107 at para 22, 243 DLR (4th) 432; Neigum v Van Seggelen, 2022 SKCA 108 at para 46, 474 DLR (4th) 673 [ 32 As this Court affirmed in its per curiam decision in Mosten Investments LP v The Manufacturers Life Insur......
  • Get Started for Free