Nelson v. Dorey, 2020 NSCA 34
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Bryson |
| Citation | 2020 NSCA 34 |
| Date | 27 March 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CA 497639 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Ezurike v. Gbeve,
...The apparent strength or merit of the proposed appeal. See: Nelson v. Dorey, 2020 NSCA 34, at ¶18-19; Farrell v. Casavant, 2010 NSCA 71, at ¶17; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70, at ¶11-12; Bellefontaine v. Schneiderman, 2006 NSCA 96, at [10] ......
-
Goulden v. Fownes,
...and 2.03(1)(c). The test for the exercise of that discretion was recently set out by the Honourable Justice Bryson in Nelson v Dorey, 2020 NSCA 34, at paras 18 … Historically, this Court has applied a three-part test when considering whether to extend ti......
-
Daye v. Savoie,
...proceedings under the Divorce Act, had to be started no more than 30 days after the date of the Order (Civil Procedure Rule, 90.13(3). [7] 2020 NSCA 34. [8] Pritchard, supra at para.">[6] Her explanation for why she did not file an appeal during the time when the right to appeal existed is ......
3 cases
-
Ezurike v. Gbeve,
...The apparent strength or merit of the proposed appeal. See: Nelson v. Dorey, 2020 NSCA 34, at ¶18-19; Farrell v. Casavant, 2010 NSCA 71, at ¶17; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70, at ¶11-12; Bellefontaine v. Schneiderman, 2006 NSCA 96, at [10] ......
-
Goulden v. Fownes,
...and 2.03(1)(c). The test for the exercise of that discretion was recently set out by the Honourable Justice Bryson in Nelson v Dorey, 2020 NSCA 34, at paras 18 … Historically, this Court has applied a three-part test when considering whether to extend ti......
-
Daye v. Savoie,
...proceedings under the Divorce Act, had to be started no more than 30 days after the date of the Order (Civil Procedure Rule, 90.13(3). [7] 2020 NSCA 34. [8] Pritchard, supra at para.">[6] Her explanation for why she did not file an appeal during the time when the right to appeal existed is ......