Neufeld v County of Mountain View
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Hughes |
| Citation | 2016 ABQB 676 |
| Date | 02 December 2016 |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,MUNICIPAL LAW,TORTS,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
H2 Canmore Apartments LP v Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd
...intends to act in the future unless the representation amounts to a covenant: Motkoski at paras 43-44; Neufeld v County of Mountain View, 2016 ABQB 676 at para 148; Queen v Cognos at 128-129; Axiom at para 64; S Maclise Enterprises Inc v Union Securities Ltd, 2009 ABCA 424 at paragraph 95 F......
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Palmer
...43-44; Keyland Development Corp v Rocky View (Municipal District No 44), 2016 ABQB 735 at para 133; Neufeld v Mountain View (County of), 2016 ABQB 676 at para 153 [ 62 Second, I do not think there is a triable issue about whether Woodhaven reasonably relied on Ms. Palmer's representati......
-
Camrose Regional Exhibition and Agricultural Society v Camrose (City)
...regarding the lands, this representation could not have amounted to a covenant of any kind. 70 In Neufeld v Mountain View (County), 2016 ABQB 676 the plaintiff developer (Neuroese) purchased lands in the County for development based upon existing municipal plans that encouraged high density......
3 cases
-
H2 Canmore Apartments LP v. Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd.
...intends to act in the future unless the representation amounts to a covenant: Motkoski at paras 43-44; Neufeld v County of Mountain View, 2016 ABQB 676 at para 148; Queen v Cognos at 128-129; Axiom at para 64; S Maclise Enterprises Inc v Union Securities Ltd, 2009 ABCA 424 at paragraph 22. ......
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Palmer
...43-44; Keyland Development Corp v Rocky View (Municipal District No 44), 2016 ABQB 735 at para 133; Neufeld v Mountain View (County of), 2016 ABQB 676 at para 153 [Neufeld]. [62] Second, I do not think there is a triable issue abou......
-
Camrose Regional Exhibition and Agricultural Society v. Camrose (City)
...could not have amounted to a covenant of any kind. [70] In Neufeld v Mountain View (County), 2016 ABQB 676 the plaintiff developer (Neuroese) purchased lands in the County for development based upon existing municipal plans that encouraged high dens......
