Ng v. Cole et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 6588 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Murray, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | INSURANCE,RESTITUTION,DAMAGES |
| Date | 24 October 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Divisional Court Rules Accident Benefits Carrier No Interest In LTD Litigation
...not have an absolute right to reduced IRBs where LTD benefits, while applied for, are not received. Further, as set out in Ng v. Cole 2013 ONSC 6588, an accident benefits carrier has no cause of action on the basis of unjust enrichment as against an LTD The content of this article is intend......
-
LTD Case Law Update - Spring 2018
...REPLACEMENT BENEFITS Two not hot off the press cases, but cases not widely known and which perhaps should be. (i) Ng v. Cole et al, 2013 ONSC 6588, The plaintiff sued Manulife for LTD and Dominion (his own insurer) for SABS and IRBS. Dominion pleaded that all IRBS and medical rehab benefits......
-
Atwi v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. et al., [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 367 (DC)
...the discretion of, their accident benefits insurer. In our view, SBAS places no such obligation on an insured. [11] In Ng v. Cole et al . 2013 ONSC 6588 it was held that an accident benefits insurer had no cause of action on the principles of unjust enrichment against an LTD insurer who had......
1 cases
-
Atwi v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. et al., [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 367 (DC)
...the discretion of, their accident benefits insurer. In our view, SBAS places no such obligation on an insured. [11] In Ng v. Cole et al . 2013 ONSC 6588 it was held that an accident benefits insurer had no cause of action on the principles of unjust enrichment against an LTD insurer who had......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Divisional Court Rules Accident Benefits Carrier No Interest In LTD Litigation
...not have an absolute right to reduced IRBs where LTD benefits, while applied for, are not received. Further, as set out in Ng v. Cole 2013 ONSC 6588, an accident benefits carrier has no cause of action on the basis of unjust enrichment as against an LTD The content of this article is intend......
-
LTD Case Law Update - Spring 2018
...REPLACEMENT BENEFITS Two not hot off the press cases, but cases not widely known and which perhaps should be. (i) Ng v. Cole et al, 2013 ONSC 6588, The plaintiff sued Manulife for LTD and Dominion (his own insurer) for SABS and IRBS. Dominion pleaded that all IRBS and medical rehab benefits......