Niemela v. Malamas et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1024
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Fenlon, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,TORTS,LIBEL AND SLANDER |
| Date | 16 June 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Giustra v. Twitter, Inc.,
...he or she is bound by the conclusions of law that I have made. “E.M. Myers J.” [1] These statutes were referred to in Niemala v. Malamas 2015 BCSC 1024 at paras.N-US">[1] These statutes were referred to in Niemala v. Malamas 2015 BCSC 1024 at paras. 33-35 ...
-
The Interplay Between BC's Statutory Tort Of Privacy And The Tort Of Defamation
...by her apartment's building management to specifically track her movements. At para. 59 Niemela v. Malamas & Niemela v. Google Inc., 2015 BCSC 1024 at para. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about......
-
Privacy Vs. Free Speech On The Internet: An Update On The Right To Be Forgotten And What Is Happening At Home
...rather than privacy. Interlocutory injunctions to remove defamatory publications are difficult to obtain. Consider Niemela v. Malamas, 2015 BCSC 1024 where a Vancouver lawyer was unsuccessful in obtaining an injunction against Google to remove links to publications concerning his conduct as......
-
Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...fact requiring trial, then what remains can be a legal question capable of determination under Rule 9-6(5)(c): see Niemela v. Malamas, 2015 BCSC 1024, at paras. 62–78. [70] The Attorney General and motor vehicle defendants contend that the plaintiffs have not established beyond a reasonable......
2 cases
-
Giustra v. Twitter, Inc.,
...he or she is bound by the conclusions of law that I have made. “E.M. Myers J.” [1] These statutes were referred to in Niemala v. Malamas 2015 BCSC 1024 at paras.N-US">[1] These statutes were referred to in Niemala v. Malamas 2015 BCSC 1024 at paras. 33-35 ...
-
Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...fact requiring trial, then what remains can be a legal question capable of determination under Rule 9-6(5)(c): see Niemela v. Malamas, 2015 BCSC 1024, at paras. 62–78. [70] The Attorney General and motor vehicle defendants contend that the plaintiffs have not established beyond a reasonable......
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Interplay Between BC's Statutory Tort Of Privacy And The Tort Of Defamation
...by her apartment's building management to specifically track her movements. At para. 59 Niemela v. Malamas & Niemela v. Google Inc., 2015 BCSC 1024 at para. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about......
-
Privacy Vs. Free Speech On The Internet: An Update On The Right To Be Forgotten And What Is Happening At Home
...rather than privacy. Interlocutory injunctions to remove defamatory publications are difficult to obtain. Consider Niemela v. Malamas, 2015 BCSC 1024 where a Vancouver lawyer was unsuccessful in obtaining an injunction against Google to remove links to publications concerning his conduct as......