Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd., (1995) 169 N.B.R.(2d) 19 (TD)
Judge | Angers, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
Case Date | November 02, 1995 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | (1995), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 19 (TD) |
Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd. (1995), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 19 (TD);
169 R.N.-B.(2e) 19; 434 A.P.R. 19
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
Richard W. (Dick) Norrad (plaintiff) v. LaHave Equipment Limited (defendant)
(F/C/720/92)
Indexed As: Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd.
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Trial Division
Judicial District of Fredericton
Angers, J.
November 2, 1995.
Summary:
A branch manager sued his employer for breach of an employment contract. The employer counterclaimed for breach of the fiduciary duty related to the contract.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, allowed the action and dismissed the counterclaim.
Master and Servant - Topic 1881
Remuneration - Severance pay - General - A 57 year old manager, who had been employed with the company for 34.5 years, knew that his division of the company was for sale - He entered into negotiations to purchase the company - While preparing for the purchase, he established his own company - No offer to purchase was made - The division was sold to a third party - The company terminated the manager's employment - His base salary was $48,000 - Had a car allowance - With commissions his salary fluctuated from $52,750 to $129,833 - Upon termination he went to work for his company receiving $36,000 plus a car allowance - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, concluded that the manager was entitled to a severance package of $50,000 plus company start up costs of $10,643.
Master and Servant - Topic 1881
Remuneration - Severance pay - General - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, stated that forewarning of termination was a factor to be considered in determining whether a severance package was within the proper range - See paragraph 15.
Master and Servant - Topic 2602
Duties of master - General - Fiduciary duty - An employee knew that the division of the company under which he worked was for sale - He entered into negotiations to purchase the division - To retain the business and financial backing of a client, he negotiated with the client and provided it with financial information respecting the company without the company's knowledge - The division was sold to a third party - The company terminated the employee's employment - The employee sued for breach of the employment contract - The company counterclaimed for breach of the fiduciary duty related to the contract - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, concluded that although the employee's actions were inappropriate they did not amount to a breach of trust - See paragraph 12.
Master and Servant - Topic 7663
Dismissal of employees - With cause - Notice of dismissal - What constitutes - A corporate reorganization resulted in the sale of the division of the company under which Norrad, an employee of 34.5 years, was employed - The company gave Norrad four weeks notice that his employment would be terminated - During the notice period, Norrad was expected to report to work to complete the odds and ends of the sale - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, concluded that the four weeks did not constitute notice - See paragraph 7.
Cases Noticed:
Johnson v. Moncton Chrysler Dodge (1980) Ltd. (1991), 114 N.B.R.(2d) 192; 289 A.P.R. 192 (C.A.), dist. [para. 14].
Gregory v. New Brunswick (1989), 97 N.B.R.(2d) 144; 245 A.P.R. 144 (T.D.), dist. [para. 14].
Dey v. Valley Forest Products Ltd. (1995), 162 N.B.R.(2d) 207; 415 A.P.R. 207 (C.A.), dist. [para. 14].
Ahmad v. Procter & Gamble Inc. (1991), 44 O.A.C. 338; 34 C.C.E.L. 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15].
Counsel:
George P.L. Filliter, for the plaintiff;
Peter McLellan, Q.C., for the defendant.
This action was heard on October 31 and November 1 and 2, 1995, before Angers, J., of the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, Judicial District of Fredericton, who delivered the following decision orally on November 2, 1995.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bramble et al. v. Medis Health and Pharmaceutical Services Inc., (1999) 214 N.B.R.(2d) 111 (CA)
...v. Sears Canada Inc. (1997), 186 N.B.R.(2d) 384; 476 A.P.R. 384 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 74]. Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd. (1996), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 19; 134 A.P.R. 19 (T.D.), refd to. [para. McLeod v. ABM Systems Ltd. (1994), 144 N.B.R.(2d) 121; 368 A.P.R. 121 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 79]. Fa......
-
Holmes v. Saint John Shipbuilding Ltd.,
...to find alternate employment during the working notice period? (Emphasis added.) "[79] In Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd. (1996), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 19; 134 A.P.R. 19 (T.D.), Angers, J., refused to give any weight to a one month working notice where the employee was apparently required to devot......
-
Wood v. CTS of Canada Co., 2017 ONSC 5695
...a reasonable opportunity to find alternate employment during the working notice period? 79. In Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd. (1996), 169 N.B.R. (2d) 19 (Q.B.), Angers J. refused to give any weight to a one-month working notice where the employee was apparently required to devote much of h......
-
Bramble et al. v. Medis Health and Pharmaceutical Services Inc., (1999) 214 N.B.R.(2d) 111 (CA)
...v. Sears Canada Inc. (1997), 186 N.B.R.(2d) 384; 476 A.P.R. 384 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 74]. Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd. (1996), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 19; 134 A.P.R. 19 (T.D.), refd to. [para. McLeod v. ABM Systems Ltd. (1994), 144 N.B.R.(2d) 121; 368 A.P.R. 121 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 79]. Fa......
-
Holmes v. Saint John Shipbuilding Ltd.,
...to find alternate employment during the working notice period? (Emphasis added.) "[79] In Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd. (1996), 169 N.B.R.(2d) 19; 134 A.P.R. 19 (T.D.), Angers, J., refused to give any weight to a one month working notice where the employee was apparently required to devot......
-
Wood v. CTS of Canada Co., 2017 ONSC 5695
...a reasonable opportunity to find alternate employment during the working notice period? 79. In Norrad v. LaHave Equipment Ltd. (1996), 169 N.B.R. (2d) 19 (Q.B.), Angers J. refused to give any weight to a one-month working notice where the employee was apparently required to devote much of h......