Norris v. Norris, 2019 ONSC 2795
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | MacEachern |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 2795 |
| Date | 03 May 2019 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | FC-15-240 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
McCormack v. Fishbayn, 2020 ONSC 351
...Further, it should not be necessary to issue court orders to obtain compliance with this immediate obligation. [68] In Norris vs. Norris, 2019 ONSC 2795 at para 20 the court set out a three-step test governing the exercise of judicial discretion to strike a party's 1. Is there a triggering ......
-
N.P. v. M.P.,
...law is clear that claimed impecuniosity is not a defence to an application to strike pleadings: Peerenboom, at para 42; Norris v. Norris, 2019 ONSC 2795 at para. 29. Here, had the Father engaged in this litigation in 2021, he would have had the opportunity to make submissions on the interim......
2 cases
-
McCormack v. Fishbayn, 2020 ONSC 351
...Further, it should not be necessary to issue court orders to obtain compliance with this immediate obligation. [68] In Norris vs. Norris, 2019 ONSC 2795 at para 20 the court set out a three-step test governing the exercise of judicial discretion to strike a party's 1. Is there a triggering ......
-
N.P. v. M.P.,
...law is clear that claimed impecuniosity is not a defence to an application to strike pleadings: Peerenboom, at para 42; Norris v. Norris, 2019 ONSC 2795 at para. 29. Here, had the Father engaged in this litigation in 2021, he would have had the opportunity to make submissions on the interim......