Nortel Networks Corp. et al., Re, [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 413 (CA)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Laskin, Rosenberg and Tulloch, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | TRUSTS,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 413 (CA),2013 ONCA 518,[2013] O.A.C. Uned. 413 |
| Date | 15 August 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 15, 2023 ' May 19, 2023)
...Inc. v. VimpelCom Ltd., 2019 ONCA 354, Fresco v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2022 ONCA 115, Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 518, Solosky v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821, Grain Farmers of Ontario v. Ontario (Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change), 2016 ONCA 283......
-
2023 ONCA 363,
...judge was interpreting his own orders, his determinations are entitled to deference: see e.g., Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 518, at para. 52 In sum, the application judge was entitled to conclude that cause of action estoppel did not apply. The causes of action asserted did n......
-
Bryton Capital Corporation GP Ltd v CIM Bayview Creek Inc.,
...judge was interpreting his own orders, his determinations are entitled to deference: see e.g., Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 518, at para. 52 In sum, the application judge was entitled to conclude that cause of action estoppel did not apply. The causes of action asserted did n......
2 cases
-
2023 ONCA 363,
...judge was interpreting his own orders, his determinations are entitled to deference: see e.g., Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 518, at para. 52 In sum, the application judge was entitled to conclude that cause of action estoppel did not apply. The causes of action asserted did n......
-
Bryton Capital Corporation GP Ltd v CIM Bayview Creek Inc.,
...judge was interpreting his own orders, his determinations are entitled to deference: see e.g., Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 518, at para. 52 In sum, the application judge was entitled to conclude that cause of action estoppel did not apply. The causes of action asserted did n......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 15, 2023 ' May 19, 2023)
...Inc. v. VimpelCom Ltd., 2019 ONCA 354, Fresco v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2022 ONCA 115, Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2013 ONCA 518, Solosky v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821, Grain Farmers of Ontario v. Ontario (Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change), 2016 ONCA 283......