NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776

JudgeHonourable Justice April Grosse
Citation2019 ABQB 776
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number4801 168375
Date08 October 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Marzo 2023
    ...costs as being in the child’s best interests it is more likely they will be allowed as extraordinary: Boddy at para 49; NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776 at paras 39 and 51; AEF v LAF, 2011 PESC 23. On the other hand, lack of notice or consultation may be a relevant factor in considering whethe......
  • Groch v Groch,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 13 Diciembre 2022
    ...of the gifts: Bak at para 75; Hartley v Del Pero, 2017 ABQB 1 at paras 121-129; Kretschmer v Terringo, 2012 ABCA 345 at para 13; NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776 at para 20; Russell v Ullett Russell, 2021 ABQB 769 at para 65; Almeida v Almeida, 2012 ONSC 4074 at paras 12-13. [60]   &#x......
  • Werenka v Werenka, 2021 ABQB 1023
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 23 Diciembre 2021
    ...for post-secondary education. [paras 201 and 202] [emphasis added] [56]        See also NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776 (Grosse J.): “Each [parent] will try to use RESP funds for [full-time post-secondary] expenses before incurring the [57]   ......
  • Doyle v Canning,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Febrero 2022
    ...-       RESP funds must be used first: Buchner v Long, 2016 ABQB 523 (affirmed 2017 ABCA 382); NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776. [133]     In this case, as the father’s Guidelines income will likely exceed $200,000, and the mother’s is i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Marzo 2023
    ...costs as being in the child’s best interests it is more likely they will be allowed as extraordinary: Boddy at para 49; NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776 at paras 39 and 51; AEF v LAF, 2011 PESC 23. On the other hand, lack of notice or consultation may be a relevant factor in considering whethe......
  • Groch v Groch,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 13 Diciembre 2022
    ...of the gifts: Bak at para 75; Hartley v Del Pero, 2017 ABQB 1 at paras 121-129; Kretschmer v Terringo, 2012 ABCA 345 at para 13; NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776 at para 20; Russell v Ullett Russell, 2021 ABQB 769 at para 65; Almeida v Almeida, 2012 ONSC 4074 at paras 12-13. [60]   &#x......
  • Werenka v Werenka, 2021 ABQB 1023
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 23 Diciembre 2021
    ...for post-secondary education. [paras 201 and 202] [emphasis added] [56]        See also NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776 (Grosse J.): “Each [parent] will try to use RESP funds for [full-time post-secondary] expenses before incurring the [57]   ......
  • Doyle v Canning,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Febrero 2022
    ...-       RESP funds must be used first: Buchner v Long, 2016 ABQB 523 (affirmed 2017 ABCA 382); NR v SR, 2019 ABQB 776. [133]     In this case, as the father’s Guidelines income will likely exceed $200,000, and the mother’s is i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT