Nussbaum v Hall, 2022 ABQB 388
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Loparco |
| Citation | 2022 ABQB 388 |
| Docket Number | 1903 09874 |
| Date | 08 June 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
2134860 Alberta Ltd. v Kichton Contracting Ltd.
...must prove that a misrepresentation was made directly to the plaintiff. In support of that proposition they cite Nussbaum v Hall, 2022 ABQB 388 at para 55 and Aztec Landing Ltd. v Kazakawich, 2021 ABPC 307 at para 71 and 72. Neither of those authorities stands for that propositi......
-
Elrafih v 504147 Alberta Ltd.
...the “special relationship” analysis currently. [58] In Nussbaum v Hall, 2022 ABQB 388, at paras 58-59, Justice Loparco set out the requirements for a “special relationship”: The existence of a special relationship may be found wher......
2 cases
-
2134860 Alberta Ltd. v Kichton Contracting Ltd.
...must prove that a misrepresentation was made directly to the plaintiff. In support of that proposition they cite Nussbaum v Hall, 2022 ABQB 388 at para 55 and Aztec Landing Ltd. v Kazakawich, 2021 ABPC 307 at para 71 and 72. Neither of those authorities stands for that propositi......
-
Elrafih v 504147 Alberta Ltd.
...the “special relationship” analysis currently. [58] In Nussbaum v Hall, 2022 ABQB 388, at paras 58-59, Justice Loparco set out the requirements for a “special relationship”: The existence of a special relationship may be found wher......
