Oasis Windows Ltd. v. Coppergate Developments Inc. et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 342

CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 27, 2015
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 342;[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 342 (SCM);2015 BCSC 342
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • PR Mechanical Ltd. v. Schneider Construction Group Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 d3 Junho d3 2021
    ...Pacific National Exhibition v. Alpine Stone Ltd., 2003 BCSC 852 at paras. 10-17; Oasis Window Ltd v. Coppergate Development Inc., 2015 BCSC 342; Elbee Development Corp. v. A.D. Masonry Ltd., 1999 CanLII 2603 (BC SC); Sabihi v. Dr. Mansur Roy Inc., 2013 BCSC 1571; and Atlas Cabinet......
  • Construction Case Law Update – Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 22 d3 Junho d3 2016
    ...SCC 43, which decision, and a few others in British Columbia, are reviewed below: In Oasis Windows Ltd. V. Coppergate Developments Inc., 2015 BCSC 342, the court struck out a claim in unjust enrichment by a subcontractor (Oasis) against the owner (Coppergate) where the subcontractor had fai......
  • Unjust Enrichment: Do Subcontractors Have Common Law Remedies Against Owners?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 14 d4 Julho d4 2016
    ...adopted in Alberta in Agrium Inc. v Chubb Insurance Co. of Canada, 2002 ABQB 495 at paras 31-32. 12 Litemor Distributors at para 34. 13 2015 BCSC 342 14 Oasis at 16. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought ......
  • Abstract Construction Inc. v. Margolis, 2020 BCSC 59
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 d5 Janeiro d5 2020
    ...principles. [59]       For example, the Owners rely on Oasis Windows Ltd. v. Coppergate Developments Inc., 2015 BCSC 342, in which the Court determined that in construction contracts, where a chain of contracting exists, quantum meruit claims may be unavailable......
2 cases
  • PR Mechanical Ltd. v. Schneider Construction Group Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 d3 Junho d3 2021
    ...Pacific National Exhibition v. Alpine Stone Ltd., 2003 BCSC 852 at paras. 10-17; Oasis Window Ltd v. Coppergate Development Inc., 2015 BCSC 342; Elbee Development Corp. v. A.D. Masonry Ltd., 1999 CanLII 2603 (BC SC); Sabihi v. Dr. Mansur Roy Inc., 2013 BCSC 1571; and Atlas Cabinet......
  • Abstract Construction Inc. v. Margolis, 2020 BCSC 59
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 d5 Janeiro d5 2020
    ...principles. [59]       For example, the Owners rely on Oasis Windows Ltd. v. Coppergate Developments Inc., 2015 BCSC 342, in which the Court determined that in construction contracts, where a chain of contracting exists, quantum meruit claims may be unavailable......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Construction Case Law Update – Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 22 d3 Junho d3 2016
    ...SCC 43, which decision, and a few others in British Columbia, are reviewed below: In Oasis Windows Ltd. V. Coppergate Developments Inc., 2015 BCSC 342, the court struck out a claim in unjust enrichment by a subcontractor (Oasis) against the owner (Coppergate) where the subcontractor had fai......
  • Unjust Enrichment: Do Subcontractors Have Common Law Remedies Against Owners?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 14 d4 Julho d4 2016
    ...adopted in Alberta in Agrium Inc. v Chubb Insurance Co. of Canada, 2002 ABQB 495 at paras 31-32. 12 Litemor Distributors at para 34. 13 2015 BCSC 342 14 Oasis at 16. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT