Okoloise v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1008 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 09 October 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Li v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...that have noted shortcomings of Dr. Pilowsky’s reports in particular: Okoloise v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008 at para 7; A.C. v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1196 at para 48, citing Hernadi v Canada (Minister of Public Saf......
-
Lawal v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 301
...v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1241 per Russell J at paras 48 to 49; Okoloise v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008 per Zin J at paras 14-18. [12] Third, also when looking at the second prong of the IFA test, the RAD identified two cities as IFAs. These two c......
-
Ohwofasa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 266
...different from those in the case at bar. I agree. The facts in those two cases, as in Okoloise v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008, are so different that they cannot be used as precedents in this case. Nevertheless, I note that none of these cases refer, contrary to Adebayo......
-
Ortega v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 652
...error in finding Culiacan to be a viable IFA without a firm grounding in the evidence: Okoloise v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008 at paras 10-18; Abdalghader at paras 27-30; Utoh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 399 at paras [28] Specifically, the Applicant......
4 cases
-
Li v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...that have noted shortcomings of Dr. Pilowsky’s reports in particular: Okoloise v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008 at para 7; A.C. v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1196 at para 48, citing Hernadi v Canada (Minister of Public Saf......
-
Lawal v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 301
...v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1241 per Russell J at paras 48 to 49; Okoloise v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008 per Zin J at paras 14-18. [12] Third, also when looking at the second prong of the IFA test, the RAD identified two cities as IFAs. These two c......
-
Ohwofasa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 266
...different from those in the case at bar. I agree. The facts in those two cases, as in Okoloise v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008, are so different that they cannot be used as precedents in this case. Nevertheless, I note that none of these cases refer, contrary to Adebayo......
-
Ortega v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 652
...error in finding Culiacan to be a viable IFA without a firm grounding in the evidence: Okoloise v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1008 at paras 10-18; Abdalghader at paras 27-30; Utoh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 399 at paras [28] Specifically, the Applicant......