Oldham v. King, (1986) 44 Man.R.(2d) 90 (CA)

JudgeHall, Huband and Twaddle, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Case DateOctober 01, 1986
JurisdictionManitoba
Citations(1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90 (CA)

Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90 (CA)

MLB headnote and full text

Oldham v. King

(Suit No. 226/86)

Indexed As: Oldham v. King

Manitoba Court of Appeal

Hall, Huband and Twaddle, JJ.A.

November 17, 1986.

Summary:

A husband petitioned for a divorce. The trial judge, in a decision unreported in this series of reports, granted the divorce and ordered the husband to pay child maintenance of $100.00 for each of his two children. The wife appealed respecting the amount of child maintenance.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and increased the amount of child maintenance payable by the husband to $200.00 per month for each child.

Family Law - Topic 4014

Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance awards - To children - Effect of shared custody agreement - A mother and father agreed that their two children would live with one parent for part of the week and with the other for the rest of the week - The decree nisi provided for shared custody; this arrangement meant that accommodation for the children must be duplicated - The mother earned $900.00 per month, after tax, less than the father, who was thus in a better position to contribute to the children's maintenance - The father intended to remarry a woman with three children - The Manitoba Court of Appeal held that the mother was entitled to child maintenance and to contribution to the cost of their accommodation with her - The court increased the amount of child maintenance payable from $100.00 to $200.00 per month per child.

Counsel:

A.A. Rich, Q.C., for the appellant;

K.E. Dunlop, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard before Hall, Huband and Twaddle, J.A., of the Manitoba Court of Appeal on October 1, 1986. The decision of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Twaddle, J.A., on November 17, 1986.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 practice notes
  • Wright v. Wright, (1996) 141 Sask.R. 44 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 24, 1995
    ...T.D.), refd to. [para. 48]. Murray v. Murray (1989), 93 N.S.R.(2d) 66; 242 A.P.R. 66 (Fam. Ct.), refd to. [para. 49]. Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90; 5 R.F.L.(3d) 220 (C.A.), refd to. [para. House v. Tunney (1991), 95 Sask.R. 73; 35 R.F.L.(3d) 68 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 58]. Pyper ......
  • Monks v. Monks, (1993) 84 Man.R.(2d) 268 (QBFD)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • February 12, 1993
    ...4011 ]. Cases Noticed: Moge v. Moge (1992), 145 N.R. 1; 81 Man.R.(2d) 161; 30 W.A.C. 161 (S.C.C.), appld. [para. 6]. Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Harrop v. Harrop (1991), 95 Sask.R. 258; 37 R.F.L.(3d) 433 (Q.B.), not appld. [para. 16]. Statutes Noticed: Di......
  • Davis v. Davis and Niemar, (1994) 98 Man.R.(2d) 94 (QBFD)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • August 9, 1994
    ...order requiring the other parent to contribute, all that the primary care giver can afford. "As I pointed out in Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90; 5 R.F.L.(3d) 220 (C.A.), the sharing of care and control inevitably increases the costs of a child's care. The extent to which these......
  • Gunn v. Gunn, (1994) 100 Man.R.(2d) 6 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 23, 1994
    ...making it impossible for the other parent to provide adequately for the children" - See paragraph 12. Cases Noticed: Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90; 5 R.F.L.(3d) 220 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Court of Appeal Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. C-240; C.C.S.M., c. C-240, sect. 26(1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Wright v. Wright, (1996) 141 Sask.R. 44 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 24, 1995
    ...T.D.), refd to. [para. 48]. Murray v. Murray (1989), 93 N.S.R.(2d) 66; 242 A.P.R. 66 (Fam. Ct.), refd to. [para. 49]. Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90; 5 R.F.L.(3d) 220 (C.A.), refd to. [para. House v. Tunney (1991), 95 Sask.R. 73; 35 R.F.L.(3d) 68 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 58]. Pyper ......
  • Monks v. Monks, (1993) 84 Man.R.(2d) 268 (QBFD)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • February 12, 1993
    ...4011 ]. Cases Noticed: Moge v. Moge (1992), 145 N.R. 1; 81 Man.R.(2d) 161; 30 W.A.C. 161 (S.C.C.), appld. [para. 6]. Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Harrop v. Harrop (1991), 95 Sask.R. 258; 37 R.F.L.(3d) 433 (Q.B.), not appld. [para. 16]. Statutes Noticed: Di......
  • Davis v. Davis and Niemar, (1994) 98 Man.R.(2d) 94 (QBFD)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • August 9, 1994
    ...order requiring the other parent to contribute, all that the primary care giver can afford. "As I pointed out in Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90; 5 R.F.L.(3d) 220 (C.A.), the sharing of care and control inevitably increases the costs of a child's care. The extent to which these......
  • Gunn v. Gunn, (1994) 100 Man.R.(2d) 6 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 23, 1994
    ...making it impossible for the other parent to provide adequately for the children" - See paragraph 12. Cases Noticed: Oldham v. King (1986), 44 Man.R.(2d) 90; 5 R.F.L.(3d) 220 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Court of Appeal Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. C-240; C.C.S.M., c. C-240, sect. 26(1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT