Olumide v. Canada, [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 187
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | LeBlanc, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | COURTS,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 187,2016 FC 558,[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 187 (FC) |
| Date | 18 May 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Dalfen v. Bank of Montreal, 2016 FC 1133
...a usual range of $500.00 to $2,500.00 (see, for example, Bouchard v Canada, 2016 FC 983; Dickson v Canada, 2016 FC 836; Olumide v Canada, 2016 FC 558). Even in cases where elevated costs have been awarded to reprimand an unsuccessful party for inappropriate conduct, the awards have been com......
1 cases
-
Dalfen v. Bank of Montreal, 2016 FC 1133
...a usual range of $500.00 to $2,500.00 (see, for example, Bouchard v Canada, 2016 FC 983; Dickson v Canada, 2016 FC 836; Olumide v Canada, 2016 FC 558). Even in cases where elevated costs have been awarded to reprimand an unsuccessful party for inappropriate conduct, the awards have been com......