Olumide v. Canada, [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 187

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
JudgeLeBlanc, J.
Citation[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 187,2016 FC 558,[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 187 (FC)
Subject MatterCOURTS,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE
Date18 May 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • Dalfen v. Bank of Montreal, 2016 FC 1133
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2016
    ...a usual range of $500.00 to $2,500.00 (see, for example, Bouchard v Canada, 2016 FC 983; Dickson v Canada, 2016 FC 836; Olumide v Canada, 2016 FC 558). Even in cases where elevated costs have been awarded to reprimand an unsuccessful party for inappropriate conduct, the awards have been com......
1 cases
  • Dalfen v. Bank of Montreal, 2016 FC 1133
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2016
    ...a usual range of $500.00 to $2,500.00 (see, for example, Bouchard v Canada, 2016 FC 983; Dickson v Canada, 2016 FC 836; Olumide v Canada, 2016 FC 558). Even in cases where elevated costs have been awarded to reprimand an unsuccessful party for inappropriate conduct, the awards have been com......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT