Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Tamara L. Friesen |
| Date | 13 September 2019 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 1103 20205 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Palmer,
...included in the affidavit: Questor Technology Inc v Stagg, 2021 ABQB 636; Abel v Modi, 2020 ABQB 530 at paras 38-39; Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713. I agree with the Applicants that no party is entitled to give legal argument as evidence or to provide legal conclusions on the issues that are in......
-
Abel v Modi, 2020 ABQB 530
...irrelevant or improper information. [40] Friesen J recently canvassed several cases that considered rule 3.68(4) in Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713 [Orr], starting first with the Alberta Court of Appeal’s decision in CLM v DGW, 2004 ABCA 112 [CLM], where the Court held at para 11 that it was not......
-
Questor Technology Inc v Stagg,
...will have the benefit of knowing the case more fully, and will be better situated to balance the competing arguments: see Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713 at para 33 [43] I acknowledge that Courts routinely exercise their discretion to hear an application......
-
Green v Redlick,
...for excluding evidence is helpful. Rules of Evidence [39] In Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713, Justice Friesen summarized several cases considering Rule 3.68(4), after first setting out the evidentiary principles in paras 19 and The fund......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc. v Palmer,
...included in the affidavit: Questor Technology Inc v Stagg, 2021 ABQB 636; Abel v Modi, 2020 ABQB 530 at paras 38-39; Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713. I agree with the Applicants that no party is entitled to give legal argument as evidence or to provide legal conclusions on the issues that are in......
-
Abel v Modi, 2020 ABQB 530
...irrelevant or improper information. [40] Friesen J recently canvassed several cases that considered rule 3.68(4) in Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713 [Orr], starting first with the Alberta Court of Appeal’s decision in CLM v DGW, 2004 ABCA 112 [CLM], where the Court held at para 11 that it was not......
-
Questor Technology Inc v Stagg,
...will have the benefit of knowing the case more fully, and will be better situated to balance the competing arguments: see Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713 at para 33 [43] I acknowledge that Courts routinely exercise their discretion to hear an application......
-
Green v Redlick,
...for excluding evidence is helpful. Rules of Evidence [39] In Orr v Alook, 2019 ABQB 713, Justice Friesen summarized several cases considering Rule 3.68(4), after first setting out the evidentiary principles in paras 19 and The fund......
Request a trial to view additional results