OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice W.A. Baker |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 1066 |
| Date | 17 July 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S205731 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Ward v. Cariboo Regional District,
...Properties Ltd. v. Mosaik Property Management Ltd., 2017 NSCA 76, and OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066, although both these cases involved applications for interim/interlocutory injunctions. The principle has also been applied in the context of ......
-
Wilson v. Hunt,
...the balancing tests even where the applicant is asserting a trespass: OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066, at [58] I find the balance of convenience in this case favours the respondents. [59] &#x......
-
City of Kelowna v. 1004364 BC Ltd.,
...Balance of Convenience [16] In OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066, the court adopted a list of factors to be considered as part of the balance of convenience analysis taken from Canadian Broadcasting Corp.......
-
Wit Management Corp. v. Aulakh,
...of some of the factors involved in that assessment is set out in OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc., v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066 at [41] In assessing the balance of convenience, the court must consider the following factor......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Ward v. Cariboo Regional District, 2021 BCSC 1495
...Properties Ltd. v. Mosaik Property Management Ltd., 2017 NSCA 76, and OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066, although both these cases involved applications for interim/interlocutory injunctions. The principle has also been applied in the context of ......
-
Wilson v. Hunt, 2023 BCSC 492
...the balancing tests even where the applicant is asserting a trespass: OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066, at [58] I find the balance of convenience in this case favours the respondents. [59] &#x......
-
Wit Management Corp. v. Aulakh, 2021 BCSC 2281
...of some of the factors involved in that assessment is set out in OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc., v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066 at [41] In assessing the balance of convenience, the court must consider the following factor......
-
Banta v. Lund, 2022 BCSC 1250
...of some of the factors involved in that assessment is set out in OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066 [OSED] at para. 41: [41] In assessing the balance of convenience, the court must consider......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Hanging In The Balance: Recent Application For Injunction Considers Crane Swing Trespass In Downtown Context
...Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc. v. FS Property Inc., 2020 BCSC 1066, the BC Supreme Court issued interim injunction to prevent an owner from swinging a construction crane over its neighbour's property outside of previously agreed upon hours. The decision provides a useful exposé of wh......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...ONSC 549 ....................................................... 684, 695 OSED Howe Street Vancouver Leaseholds Inc v FS Property Inc, 2020 BCSC 1066 .......................................................................................... 303 Oswald v Start Up SRL, 2020 BCSC 1730, af’d on......
-
Injunctions to Protect Property and Reputation
...Ltd , 2017 NSCA 76 at paras 32–33 [ Maxwell Properties ]. See also OSED Howe Street Vancouver Lease-holds Inc v FS Property Inc , 2020 BCSC 1066 at paras 19–26. 9 Ibid. 10 RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (Attorney General) , [1994] 1 SCR 311 [ RJR-MacDonald ]. 11 Ibid at para 41. THE LAW OF EQUI......