Oshkabewisens v. Desmoulin, 2020 ONSC 6106
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | A.D. KURKE J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 6106 |
| Docket Number | D18-0027/AP |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 14 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 21 ' 25, 2022)
...Valoris Pour Enfants et Adultes de Prescott-Russell, 2017 ONCA 601, C.G.W. v. M.J. et al (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 44 (C.A.), J.E.O. v. M.D., 2020 ONSC 6106, Formal Customary Care: A Practice Guide to Principles, Processes and Best Practices (Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2013) Karia Estate v. Ka......
-
M.L. v. Dilico Anishinabek Child and Family Care, 2022 ONCA 240
...child protection proceeding or valid customary care agreement: C.G.W. v. M.J. et al (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 44 (C.A.); J.E.O. v. M.D., 2020 ONSC 6106. The court has the discretion to add these individuals as parties to a child protection proceeding or determine whether their CLRA application m......
-
D.A. v. G.H. and Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, 2021 ONCJ 95
...I find this OC-CCA to be invalid. The J.E.O. Case [64] Following argument in this matter, the case of J.E.O. v. M.D., 2020 ONSC 6106, was released and I invited the parties to submit their arguments based on the [65] In the J.E.O. case, a child was......
-
M.L. et al v. B.T., et al, 2021 ONSC 5887
...J. [26] 2021 ONCJ 95. [27] 2021 ONCJ 95 at para. 78. [28] Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, at para. 8, 10, 25 and 36 [29] 2020 ONSC 6106 at para. 47. [30] Unpublished M.L. v. B.T. and Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, FO -17-0158-00, September 12, 2019.
3 cases
-
M.L. v. Dilico Anishinabek Child and Family Care, 2022 ONCA 240
...child protection proceeding or valid customary care agreement: C.G.W. v. M.J. et al (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 44 (C.A.); J.E.O. v. M.D., 2020 ONSC 6106. The court has the discretion to add these individuals as parties to a child protection proceeding or determine whether their CLRA application m......
-
D.A. v. G.H. and Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, 2021 ONCJ 95
...I find this OC-CCA to be invalid. The J.E.O. Case [64] Following argument in this matter, the case of J.E.O. v. M.D., 2020 ONSC 6106, was released and I invited the parties to submit their arguments based on the [65] In the J.E.O. case, a child was......
-
M.L. et al v. B.T., et al, 2021 ONSC 5887
...J. [26] 2021 ONCJ 95. [27] 2021 ONCJ 95 at para. 78. [28] Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, at para. 8, 10, 25 and 36 [29] 2020 ONSC 6106 at para. 47. [30] Unpublished M.L. v. B.T. and Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, FO -17-0158-00, September 12, 2019.
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 21 ' 25, 2022)
...Valoris Pour Enfants et Adultes de Prescott-Russell, 2017 ONCA 601, C.G.W. v. M.J. et al (1981), 34 O.R. (2d) 44 (C.A.), J.E.O. v. M.D., 2020 ONSC 6106, Formal Customary Care: A Practice Guide to Principles, Processes and Best Practices (Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2013) Karia Estate v. Ka......