Osooli-Talesh v. Emami, [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 58
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Sigurdson, J. |
| Citation | [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 58,2008 BCSC 1749,[2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 58 (SC),2008 BCSC 119 |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,EVIDENCE,PRACTICE,CONTRACTS |
| Date | 31 January 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 practice notes
-
Luu v. Wang et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 626
...the conduct of the plaintiff should also be considered in determining whether special costs are appropriate: Osooli-Talesh v. Emami , 2008 BCSC 1749 at paras. 48-49. They say that the court made adverse findings respecting the plaintiff's credibility and that Mr. Luu's document production w......
-
Luu v. Wang, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1078 (SC)
...reflect the parties' true intentions. The parol evidence rule may not be used a vehicle for fraud or deception: Osooli-Talesh v. Emami , 2008 BCSC 119 at para. 285. [107] Here, each of the defendants' pleadings contains allegations that the Settlement Agreement was a sham and that Lily Wang......
-
Chieftain Metals Inc. v. Tulsequah Wilderness Adventures Inc. et al., 2013 BCSC 406
...the filing of false evidence is reprehensible conduct which satisfies the test for special costs. They rely on Osooli-Talesh v. Emami , 2008 BCSC 1749 ; Perez (a.k.a. Gillespie) v. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver , 2003 BCSC 579; and Chu v. Chu , 2001 BCSC 1648. [34] In my view, an......
-
Jordan et al. v. Bains et al.,
...parties. As noted in Hassel v. Khoshgoo, 2010 BCSC 233, 2010 CarswellBC 431 (QL), at para. 15, which quotes Osooli-Talesh v. Emani, 2008 BCSC 119, 2008 CarswellBC 582, at para. 254 as … Extrinsic evidence is generally not admissible to vary, modify, or add to the express terms ......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Luu v. Wang et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 626
...the conduct of the plaintiff should also be considered in determining whether special costs are appropriate: Osooli-Talesh v. Emami , 2008 BCSC 1749 at paras. 48-49. They say that the court made adverse findings respecting the plaintiff's credibility and that Mr. Luu's document production w......
-
Luu v. Wang, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1078 (SC)
...reflect the parties' true intentions. The parol evidence rule may not be used a vehicle for fraud or deception: Osooli-Talesh v. Emami , 2008 BCSC 119 at para. 285. [107] Here, each of the defendants' pleadings contains allegations that the Settlement Agreement was a sham and that Lily Wang......
-
Chieftain Metals Inc. v. Tulsequah Wilderness Adventures Inc. et al., 2013 BCSC 406
...the filing of false evidence is reprehensible conduct which satisfies the test for special costs. They rely on Osooli-Talesh v. Emami , 2008 BCSC 1749 ; Perez (a.k.a. Gillespie) v. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver , 2003 BCSC 579; and Chu v. Chu , 2001 BCSC 1648. [34] In my view, an......
-
Jordan et al. v. Bains et al.,
...parties. As noted in Hassel v. Khoshgoo, 2010 BCSC 233, 2010 CarswellBC 431 (QL), at para. 15, which quotes Osooli-Talesh v. Emani, 2008 BCSC 119, 2008 CarswellBC 582, at para. 254 as … Extrinsic evidence is generally not admissible to vary, modify, or add to the express terms ......
Request a trial to view additional results