Ostergaard v Uhl,
Judge | Honourable Madam Justice S.L. Hunt McDonald |
Neutral Citation | 2020 ABQB 789 |
Docket Number | 1901 14220 |
Citation | 2020 ABQB 789 |
Date | 15 December 2020 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Ong v Fedoruk,
...Generation Partnership, 2022 ABCA 206, aff’g 2019 ABQB 486. Moreover, as Justice Hunt McDonald observed in Ostergaard v. Uhl, 2020 ABQB 789, section 20 allows for (at para 55) “an extended leeway on the part of arbitrators to ensure, in part, a workable ‘fit’ to ......
-
Singh v Modgill,
...and arbitral tribunals to adhere to the principles of natural justice and implement fair procedures: for example, Ostergard v Uhi, 2020 ABQB 789, Mericle v Basement Systems (Calgary) Inc, 2010 ABQB 137. In particular, the applicants cite Justice O’Brien in Jardine Lloyd Thompson Cana......
3 cases
-
Ong v Fedoruk,
...Generation Partnership, 2022 ABCA 206, aff’g 2019 ABQB 486. Moreover, as Justice Hunt McDonald observed in Ostergaard v. Uhl, 2020 ABQB 789, section 20 allows for (at para 55) “an extended leeway on the part of arbitrators to ensure, in part, a workable ‘fit’ to ......
-
Singh v Modgill,
...and arbitral tribunals to adhere to the principles of natural justice and implement fair procedures: for example, Ostergard v Uhi, 2020 ABQB 789, Mericle v Basement Systems (Calgary) Inc, 2010 ABQB 137. In particular, the applicants cite Justice O’Brien in Jardine Lloyd Thompson Cana......
-
Uhl v Ostergaard,
...of this court found that the arbitrator had breached procedural fairness and remitted the matter back to arbitration: Ostergaard v. Uhl, 2020 ABQB 789 Can LII. She suggested that the new arbitrator should be selected with a view to ensuring that accounting expertise would be brought to 13 A......